作者lovelyvivian (persist)
看板GMAT
标题[语文] GWD-18-Q20(CR)
时间Tue Sep 22 14:39:54 2009
(Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the
Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development.) They plan to do this
by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-
conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the
highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders.
On the other hand, (these farmers will never actually sell any of the land,
provided that farming it remains viable.) But farming will not remain
viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the
financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why
a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to
modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.
In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the
following roles?
A. The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived;
the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.
B. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be
attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.
C. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained;
the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.
D. The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being
evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the
argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy.
E. The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents
a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be
met in the foreseeable future.
答案是(D)
可以用排除法删去
(A)ill-conceived;rejection
(B)cannot be attained;support the conclution
(E)endorses;
但是(C)要怎麽排除
还有(D)的整句话可能没看懂,谁能帮忙解释一下吗?
P.S.每次做黑脸题,搞得我脸都黑了
--
如果骄傲没被现实大海冷冷拍下 又怎会懂得要多努力才走得到远方
如果梦想不曾坠落悬崖千钧一发 又怎会晓得执着的人拥有隐形翅膀
最初的梦想紧握在手上 最想要去的地方 怎麽能在半路就返航
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.130.192.208
1F:推 fshy:(C)第ㄧ句原文并没有提到该goal可以attain.原文只是批评原先 09/22 22:14
2F:→ fshy:方法考虑不周. 然後提出第二个比较好的办法. (C)第二句 09/22 22:15
3F:→ fshy:disputing that conclusion好像也说不通. 相对D选项C比较不好 09/22 22:15
4F:→ fshy:不过我承认这些都是事後知道答案试着解释给自己听的. 做黑脸 09/22 22:16
5F:→ fshy:题我也是快轰了. 09/22 22:17