https://i.imgur.com/VH8QRfO.gif https://i.imgur.com/oAztRki.gif 补一些评论 网友A : "When u look at videos like these you realize all these penalties are in reality for the outcome rather than the action of any driver. 当您观看此类影片时，您会意识到所有这些处罚实际上都是针对结果而不是任何驾驶员的 行为。 Max knew how to stay away from Sainz thus avoiding contact, Norris stayed put while having much more room to play with and got hit thus Max got a penalty. 马克斯知道如何远离塞恩斯来避免碰撞，诺里斯更激进的留在原地，虽然旁边还有空间， 并被碰撞，因此马克斯受罚。 And all the Media love to paint one side as villain and another as the hero, this has been the case with F1 for decades." 所有媒体都喜欢把一方描绘成恶棍，另一方描绘成英雄，几十年来F1都是如此。 网友B : The same thing happened with Vettel and Lewis as well with the squeezing. 同样的事情也发生在维特尔和汉米尔顿身上(2018)。 I really think that Max did nothing more than what we see a million other times when drivers squeeze each other and I do think that Lando had room to go on the kerb. 我真的认为马克斯所做的只不过是我们在其他一百万次车手互相挤压时看到的事情，而且 我确实认为兰多在路边有空间。 网友C : true. It can be said for both the moving under braking and the divebombs. 真的。对於煞车变线和鱼雷炸弹都是如此。 If Norris doesn't move when Max is moving under braking, they crash, get damaged, and both lose out. 如果诺里斯在麦克斯煞车时不动，他们就会撞车、车坏掉，然後双双退赛。 If Max doesn't avoid when Lando pulls off a divebomb, they crash, get damaged, and both lose out. 如果麦克斯在兰多发射鱼雷时没有躲避，他们就会撞车、受损，然後一样双退。 IMO this is also why it's important to actually punish for the incident, rather than only when it causes a crash as the penalties will rarely/never be severe enough to make up for whatever you lose as a result of a collision. 在我看来，这也是为什麽对事故进行实际惩罚很重要，而不仅仅是在事故造成 车损(退赛)时才进行惩罚，因为惩罚很少/永远不会严重到足以弥补碰撞造成的任何损失。 原贴 : https://reurl.cc/gGX3Lp --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 211.72.126.29 (台湾) ※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/FORMULA1/M.1719799860.A.ED7.html