看板FB_security
标 题Re: old perl vulnerabilitiy
发信站NCTU CS FreeBSD Server (Sat Mar 16 06:55:49 2013)
转信站ptt!csnews.cs.nctu!news.cs.nctu!.cs.nctucs.nctu!!freebsdfreebsd.org!ow
Hi,
Did you try "portaudit -Fda", which downloads the newest portaudit
database.
portaudit downloads it once a couple of days by default, if my memory
is still working.
So, it could be your first node happens to download database today,
but not the other node.
Thank you!
--
moto kawasaki <
[email protected]>
From:
[email protected]
To:
[email protected]
Subject: old perl vulnerabilitiy
Date:Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:30:20 +0400
Message-ID: <
[email protected]>
freebsd> Hello Freebsd-security,
freebsd>
freebsd> I've got portaudit alarm on perl-5.8.9_7 with regard to
freebsd>
freebsd> perl -- denial of service via algorithmic complexity attack on hashing routines.
freebsd> Reference:
http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/68c1f75b-8824-11e2-9996-c48508086173.html
freebsd>
freebsd> But on the other server I have perl-threaded-5.8.9_7
freebsd> and portaudit thinks that it is OK (no problem)
freebsd>
freebsd> Is it correct?
freebsd> It seems to me that threaded perl also should have the same problem.
freebsd>
freebsd> Please advise.
freebsd>
freebsd> PS. I know that it is old and "unsupported" but I don't want to
freebsd> upgrade without serious reason. And, any way, the "behavior" of
freebsd> portaudit seems to me not correct.
freebsd>
freebsd>
freebsd> With best regards,
freebsd> Alexandre Krasnov.
freebsd>
freebsd>
freebsd> _______________________________________________
freebsd>
[email protected] mailing list
freebsd>
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
freebsd> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
[email protected]"
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
[email protected]"