※ 引述《cmyk (ETERNAL)》之铭言： : 大家好 : 我在阅读文章时看到一句子: : The anthropologists say that the number of times red wins is not simply by : chance, but that these results are statistically significant. : 我有以下两点疑问 : 1.文中的wins 和 is 都是动词，为什麽两个动词摆在一起，wins後面没有受词，而wins : 的主词是the number of times red吗，觉得很奇怪。 the number of times (red wins) is not simply by chance --- ---- S V 看成上面这样－红色赢用来修饰次数 : 2. but that，查了一下文法书说是用来表示与事实相反，如果是这样前一句不是应该用 : should (would, could, might)＋VR的形式吗?而且翻译起来语意也不顺。 这边的 but that 不是你查到的 but that， 这里应该比较偏向两种文法混合版： The anthropologists say that... not simply..., but that... --- ------- === === ------- V 名词子句1 名词子句2 : 不知道观念哪边错误了，麻烦帮忙指正 : 谢谢 : 附上原文 : Hill and Barton report that when one contestant is much better than the : other, colour has no effect on the result. However, when there is only a : small difference between them, the effect of colour is sufficient to tip the : balance. The anthropologists say that the number of times red wins is not : simply by chance, but that these results are statistically significant. -- ┌────┐国家研究院◆ Academy◆ EarthEnviron◆ Ecophilia环境板 ξＦ │ ─┤ │ ├──┬──┬──┬┐┌┬──┬┐ ┌──┬──┐绿色生活，从我开始。 │ ─┤ ┌┤ ││ ─│└┘├┐┌┤│ └┐┌┤ ─ │﹊﹊﹊﹊﹊﹊﹊●﹊﹊ │ │ └┤ ││┌─┤┌┐├┘└┤└─┬┘└┤┌┐│ ●◣◢ └────┴──┴──┴┘█└┘└┴──┴──┴──┴┘└┘▆▅▅▄▃▂▁ ◢ --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 218.173.177.219 ※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/Eng-Class/M.1488987150.A.710.html ※ 编辑: jtmh (218.173.177.219), 03/08/2017 23:33:27