作者hopeliu (阿翔)
看板Eng-Class
标题[文法] 与事实相反
时间Sun Jan 6 16:27:40 2013
与事实相反(counterfactual)文法问题
If he ___________ that, he ________________ a thief.
(a)does will been
(b)were to steal would are
(c)were to steal will be
(d)were to steal would be
答案给的是d，
c选项不对的理由是？
我在想到底是句子正确但不是与事实相反？还是句子本身错误？
谢各位大大。
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 58.114.191.171
1F：推 campfire:这是与未来事实相反的假设 所以C的will要改成would 01/06 16:58
2F：→ campfire:If + S + were to + V , S + should/could/would/might 01/06 16:59
3F：→ campfire: + V 01/06 17:00
4F：推 tijj:d之外,c可以是正确选项. 01/08 11:10
5F：推 l10nel:未来可能性小（但非完全不可能），c) were to + would 正常 01/08 13:48
6F：→ l10nel: ^^d) would 正常 01/08 13:48
7F：→ l10nel:c) will 是极少见的边缘用法,的确出现在某些书中,杂志文章, 01/08 13:49
8F：→ l10nel:小说,粗略估计will/would比率大概1:30吧,不建议用will。 01/08 13:50
9F：→ l10nel:这were是past subjunctive,很自然搭配will的过去式would。 01/08 13:53
※ 编辑: hopeliu 来自: 58.114.190.38 (01/13 16:04)
10F：→ hopeliu:谢各位大大 01/13 16:05