※ 引述《AppleRam (苹果羊咩咩)》之铭言： : 这篇是有关美国陪审团的文章 这一句我一直翻的不满意 : 有请英文强者解救 ＠＠ 感谢～ : This legislative history shows that congressional commitment to the : cross-sectional ideal was more qualified than the bold policy declaration : with which the statute opens might otherwise have indicated. : 这个立法历程显示国会对於跨阶层理想的致力更符合法条精神，而非只是像条文看似指称 : 的大胆政策宣言。 : = : 谢谢热心的大家～ the bold policy declaration with which the statute opens => the statute opens with the bold policy declaration 也就是说the statute开头宣告了一段 bold policy declaration 所以是...than the bold policy declaration might otherwise have indicated 而might otherwise have indicated则是意指这段宣言指出跟前面所提到 "congressional commitment to cross-sectional ideal was more qualified"不同(或 相反)的情况 例如 congressional commitment to cross-sectional ideal was less qualified or something else would be more qualified...(因为没有更多的上下文所 以不知道这个宣言指出什麽) 所以你的翻译我会修正为: 立法历程显示国会致力於cross-sectional ideal，相较此法条开头阐述的大胆政策宣言所 另指之情形而言更为qualified(?) 翻译得没有很好 但我已尽力表达我对这句子的解读了 希望不会太复杂orz 另外cross-sectional ideal是说a concept of producing a jury that best represents the commuity 所以你可以斟酌应该怎翻成中文才好 以上供你参考 欢迎指教 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.20.154.170