作者bbclearning (Learner)
看板Eng-Class
标题Re: [求译] 一小段法律英文
时间Sun Apr 22 03:23:14 2012
立法的历史显示，相较於开放式地解读法条而作出大胆的政策宣示而言，
国会致力於横断法选取陪审团之理想显得更有资格。
1. cross-sectional ideal is a law term which is not that easy to be put
in Chinese for just literal explanation.....always better to make it
clear
2. "qualified" can be translated in different ways on different contexts
my translation might not be a good one...just for your reference
※ 引述《AppleRam (苹果羊咩咩)》之铭言：
: 这篇是有关美国陪审团的文章 这一句我一直翻的不满意
: 有请英文强者解救 ＠＠ 感谢～
: This legislative history shows that congressional commitment to the
: cross-sectional ideal was more qualified than the bold policy declaration
: with which the statute opens might otherwise have indicated.
: 这个立法历程显示国会对於跨阶层理想的致力更符合法条精神，而非只是像条文看似指称
: 的大胆政策宣言。
: =
: 谢谢热心的大家～
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.119.144.88
1F：推 AppleRam:谢谢你～ 04/22 12:13
2F：推 noatu:就如 qualified opinion 翻为 "保留意见" (accounting) 04/22 22:38