这一段给了几个数据 我看了好几次还是搞不太清楚 麻烦大大帮忙分析 Two pieces of information available in the NCVS support this view. First, victims who used guns were substantially more likely than victims in general or victims using other self-protection measures to face offenders armed with guns - 32.7 percent of victims who attacked the offender with a gun, and 21.8 percent of those who threatened the offender with a gun, and 21.8 percent of those who threatened the offender with a gun, faced offenders with guns, compared to only 6.8 percent of all victims who used self-protection measures, and 2.2 percent of all victims. Second, victims who used guns were more likely to face multiple offenders - 33.2 percent of victims who attacked offenders with a gun and 34.5 percent of those who threatened with a gun confronted multiple adversaries, compared to 20.6 percent of all those who used self-protection measures, and 6.2 percent of all victims. These findings are consistent with the view that crime circumstances likely to appear more dangerous to victims are more likely to push victims into using guns. They are contrary to the speculation that crime outcomes are better for gun-wielding victims merely because other circumstances of the crime made successful outcomes more likely." 所以第一份资料显示，受害者使用枪枝抵抗有枪的歹徒的人数是比那些没有使用 枪枝而改用其他工具防御的受害者数目来的多 32.7%的受害者会攻击使用枪的违法者 21.8%的受害者会使用枪 6.8%的受害者采取其他措施 2.2%的受害者？(看不懂) 第二份资料显示，有枪的受害者比较有可能遇到多种的违法者 33.2%会攻击使用枪的违法者 34.5%会遇到多种敌人 20.6%采取其他措施 6.2? 一整个迷惑..... --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 115.83.1.115