※ 引述《lilowsa (akira)》之铭言： : 近日在阅读空中美语杂志2011年11月号其中一篇"Organ Transplants Take Tragic Turn" : 在第二段时遇到一点困难 : 原文如下: : It was later revealed that the tragic mistake was due to a mix-up during a : a phone call,in which a staff member at NTUH misheard the donor's : test results as "non-reactive," when they were actually described as : being "reactive." : 问题(1)请问要如何将in which还原成独立子句?which是指前句的a phone call吗? : 我理解为a staff member at NTUH.....being "reactive" in a phone call : 这样正确吗? It was later revealed that the tragic mistake was due to a mix-up druing a phone call. In the phone call, a staff member at NTUH misheard the donor's test results as "non-reactive", when they were actually described as being "reactive". => It was later revealed that the tragic mistake was due to a mix-up druing a phone call, which a staff member at NTUH misheard the donor's test results as "non-reactive", when they were actually described as being "reactive" in. 找到in在哪里了吗XD 整个很怪，所以大家都会写成 in which : 问题(2)原文里being，为何该处要用being? 不能省略不用吗? : 谢谢回答的先进们!! 关系子句当中的when子句里面的they=the donor's results The donor's results are "active". 主词动词形容词补语 The donor's results are described as being "active". 被动语态 还原成主动语态 Someone describes the donor's results as being "active". 主词动词受词 as X X作为修饰受词的身分状态，受词是名词，身分状态当然也要是名词 不过引号都做出来了，就算不写being，大家还是看得懂 但这时单独出现的"active"就装得好像名词一样了 -- まだ始まったばかりです！いくらでもやり直せます！ よろしいですか。よろしいですか？ 例え、例えですね、明日死ぬとしても、やり直しちゃいけないって、 谁が决めたんですか？谁が决めたんですか？ まだまだこれからです。 （古畑任三郎） --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 74.110.53.160 ※ 编辑: hereafter 来自: 74.110.53.160 (11/17 09:13)