大家好 因近日在读一篇文章 其中有几句话怎麽翻都不顺 所以想请教大家 1) Nursing has inherited a "legacy of positivism", which promotes objectivity and reductionism and which excludes subjective meaning and the personal from the research process. [自己的翻译] 护理继承了"实证主义的遗产" -提昇客观与简化论及排除研究过程中主观意义与个人形式。 [有疑问的点] "reductionism"我查到的是指"简化论;还原论(-ism)" 可是这样和客观(objectivity)在and的左右就不对等了 还是我解读错误? 2) Hence nursing can be considered as a full and legitimate response to birth, death, health and illness, not limited by or endeavouring to control the diversity of other approaches to such human experiences. [自己的翻译] 於是护理可以考虑对於出生、死亡、健康与疾病做恰当及合理的反应， 不受制於或努力控制此类人们经验接近的其他差异 [有疑问的点] "...not limited by or endeavouring to control the diversity of other approaches to such human experiences." 我翻为"不受制於或努力控制此类人们经验接近的其他差异" 可是怎麽看都觉得怪怪的... 3) this places nurses in direct competition with medics, whose educational focus is located in scientific clinical practice, not in caring as is the case with nursing. Resulting competitiveness for excellence in scientific evidence-based clinical practice provides nurses with a setting in which to reconfirm a position at a lower point in a hierarchy of clinical achievement. [自己的翻译] 这置护理人员於与医学生的直接竞争中， 这些医学生的教育焦点局限在科学的临床实务，不是如同护理在照护上。 导致以科学实证为基础的临床实务有优良的竞争力提供护理人员环境临床成就 的阶级地位上较低位置的再确认。 [有疑问的点] (1) "competitiveness for excellence"-->"优良的竞争力"? (2) "setting"-->在这里我采用"环境"的意思 可是整句怎麽看怎麽怪....= =a 4)In part this has been due to the powerful influence of medical hegemony, which has defined the nature of legitimate knowledge [自己的翻译] 在某种程度上这已经导致医学领导权被定义为正当合法知识的有力的影响。 谢谢大家耐心的看完与指正 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.20.149.142