以下这段看不太懂... Instead, he'll turn, with irony, to the Web, where he'll find plenty to read, especially if he's looking for (1)it today: The New York Times has just published two stories, a blog post, and an interactive feature (2-1)arguing that the electronic methods (2-2)by which they themselves are (2-3)delivered are “intrusive, have increased [people's] levels of stress and have made it difficult to concentrate.” 疑问如下： (1) 这里的it 是指 The New York Times...concentrate. 这篇文章吗 (2) -1 arguing是 which is arguing 的简化吗? 可是非人怎麽会argue(解释为主张?) -2 by which这句的还原如下，是吗? They themselves are delivered.....concentrated” by the electronic methods. -3 deliver 在这里怎麽解释阿? (3) 我对这段的理解如下，是对的吗? (因为其实看不太懂) 讽刺的是，他会开始上网，并且在网路上发现一大堆可读的， 特别是他今天所寻找的文章: 纽约时报已有两种网路出版品， 一种是部落格，一种是互动媒材。 这种互动媒材自己也被视为「入侵的，会增加人的压力且造成不专心」 == 原文出处: http://0rz.tw/hMe9b 感谢大家 Orz --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.134.38.124 ※ 编辑: alicezzz 来自: 220.134.38.124 (05/17 17:38) ※ 编辑: alicezzz 来自: 220.134.38.124 (05/17 17:53)