作者tengharold (RoadMan_A)
看板Eng-Class
标题Re: [请益] implementation跟introduction
时间Sat Aug 28 02:16:30 2010
※ 引述《xpower50 (37303)》之铭言:
: The police have monitored the number of drink-related accidents
: since the introduction of a ban on drinking and driving in Hong
: Kong.
: Tenancy holders must provide documents to prove that the factory
: existed before the implementation of the redevelopment plan.
: 想请问在这种地方implementation跟introduction可以互换吗
: 是不是都是代表开始实施的意思 非常谢谢~~~~~
introduction 光看字义未必代表执行
implementation 则一定有执行
第一段 introduction of a ban "禁令"一定有执行,没执行的禁令不叫禁令,叫禁令草案
(plan/draft/proposal for a ban)
尤其是前面还说警察在监控数据变化
所以一定是警察开始执行後才能监控禁令的效果,不论是用introduction 或
implementation都不会搞不懂到底有没有执行
所以第一段两个可以互换,不会造成意义的变化
第二段
Tenancy holders must do X to prove Y before the implementation of Z
译为 "在实施Z之前tenancy holders 要做 X 来证明 Y"
但如implementation改成introduction
tenancy holders must do X to prove Y before the introduction of Z
解释成"在Z进入议会受讨论之前/在Z被公布之前/在提出Z之前 tenancy holders ..."
也都ok
代表在此implementation换成introduction意义会变
所以在第二段这两个字不能互通
以上供大家讨论~
--
Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to
say something. -Plato (427BC-347BC)
Plato is boring. -Frederich Nietzsche (1844-1900)
Nietzsche was stupid and abnormal. -Leo Tolstoy (1828-1910)
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 70.166.3.190
1F:推 xpower50:喔喔~~我了解了 谢谢t大指教:) 08/29 09:24
2F:→ ineedhope:推推~ 08/29 14:33