作者KirinGuess (Kirin)
看板Eng-Class
标题[文法] 请教两种写法的意义区别
时间Thu Apr 29 01:48:44 2010
以下有两个句子，分别都使用两种写法，
不知道我对它们的理论有没有错误，
麻烦大家指正，谢谢。
句子1的写法1：
The farmers watched the old bridge being swept away by flood.
农民们眼看着老桥被洪流冲走。 <= 重点在被冲走这个情况
句子1的写法2：
The farmers watched the old bridge which was swept away by flood.
The farmers watched the old bridge swept away by flood. <= 关代的省略
农民们看着那座被洪流冲走的老桥。 <= 重点在老桥这个物体
句子2的写法1：
Having been educated in England, my uncle speaks English very well.
由於曾在英国受教育，我叔叔英文说得很好。 <= 强调曾在英国受教育这个原因
句子1的写法2：
My Uncle who has been educated in England speaks English very well.
My Uncle educated in England speaks English very well. <= 关代的省略
我那个曾在英国受教育的叔叔英文说得很好。 <= 曾在英国受教育只是附带说明
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.33.213.179
※ 编辑: KirinGuess 来自: 114.33.213.179 (04/29 01:50)
1F：→ memorabilia:句子2的写法2是暗指我有其它没去英国念书的叔伯舅 04/30 04:20
2F：→ memorabilia:这是限定用法，所以写法2应该要在who前加个逗号(非限 04/30 04:21
3F：→ memorabilia:定用法) 04/30 04:22
4F：→ memorabilia:My uncle, who has been educated in England, speaks 04/30 04:24
5F：→ memorabilia:如此一来就是你所要表达的强调不同原因的句子 04/30 04:25
6F：→ memorabilia:句子1的写法2, 如果要将老桥当成重点的话, 则老桥必需 04/30 04:27
7F：→ memorabilia:成为主词, 否则此三句看来都一样 04/30 04:28
8F：→ memorabilia:The old bridge that the farmers watched was swept 04/30 04:30
9F：→ memorabilia:然後我觉得句1写法1 是不是要用were watching? 04/30 04:49