作者kolun (...)
看板Economics
标题Re: [请益] 对经济茫然
时间Fri Nov 12 17:18:40 2010
※ 引述《forng (机会)》之铭言:
: 小弟一直有个疑惑
: 希望板上的前辈来给小第一些开示
: 小弟念个体经济学一直觉得
: 个经到底能不能在生活上应用到?
: 像学了 完全竞争市场下的均衡解
: 独占 寡占等等的模型
: 对目前的我来说 除了为了考试而念之外我不知道这些对於我未来有甚麽用
: 像总经我还可以用来推测总体趋势
: 可是个经我念的真的是一点目的性都没有
: 除了用来训练逻辑思考外
: 在经营企业上 真的用的到这些模型吗?
: 念通这些模型 除了用来考研究所之外还有何用途?
: 这些是小弟想要请教的长久以来的疑惑 谢谢~
刚好看到一篇paper的abstract 也算是个经的领域
看完之後我觉得很有意义 对未来可能也会有帮助
这个目的更是伟大 在生活上的应用上我觉得潜力无限
下面是title跟abstract供你参考
Terms of Endearment: An Equilibrium Model of Sex and Matching --
by Peter Arcidiacono, Andrew W. Beauchamp, Marjorie B. McElroy
We develop a directed search model of relationship formation which can
disentangle male and female preferences for types of partners and for
different relationship terms using only a cross-section of observed matches.
Individuals direct their search to a particular type of match on the basis
of (i) the terms of the relationship, (ii) the type of partner, and
(iii) the endogenously determined probability of matching.
If men outnumber women, they tend to trade a low probability of a preferred
match for a high probability of a less-preferred match; the analogous
statement holds for women. Using data from National Longitudinal Study of
Adolescent Health we estimate the equilibrium matching model with high school
relationships. Variation in gender ratios is used to uncover male and female
preferences. Estimates from the structural model match subjective data on
whether sex would occur in one's ideal relationship. The equilibrium result
shows that some women would ideally not have sex, but do so out of matching
concerns; the reverse is true for men.
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.135.19.182
1F:推 tnsshpig:你现在在念matching model阿~ 11/15 11:27