另类视角——英格兰，切尔西 http://bbs.qieerxi.com/viewthread.php?tid=64065&extra=page%3D1 新闻来源：http://www.chelseafc.com/page/NewsHomePage/0,,10268~1001862,00.html 新闻翻译：cumtowen 版权所有：切尔西中文网 Neil Barnett has been writing, editing and broadcasting for Chelsea for over 20 years. 尼尔－巴尼特已经为切尔西担任写作、编辑和解说工作超过20年。 All the other journalists have had their say on England, and I disagree with them all. So here is my view. Not surprisingly, it's very informed by Chelsea experiences. 所有的记者都对英格兰国家队的表现发表了各自的看法，不过我并不同意他们的看法，因 此我会通过这篇文章表达自己的观点，当然不可否认，文章也会涉及到切尔西的经验。 England drew in Israel and because the team didn't win were lamentable. But they played the right way. They kept possession. What they lacked was urgency and, to an extraordinary degree, ability. 英格兰在以色列以平局收场，球队因为没有获胜而感到沮丧，不过他们踢的不错，他们控 制着比赛。他们所缺乏的是毅力，说的更为特别些，是能力。 Back at the end of the 1990s, before Chelsea TV, when the club did that half- hour Channel Chelsea show every Friday, I had lunch in Arkles with Marcel Desailly and we filmed it. 回想上个世纪90年代末，那时切尔西电视台还没有正式成立，俱乐部只是会在每个周五播 放半个小时的切尔西频道。当时我正和德塞利在Arkles一起吃午饭，我们俩就一起看了这 个频道的节目。 During a period off camera, he said that the young reserve centre-half John Terry would play for England for a long time, and was head and shoulders above certain England defenders who would not get in any other European national team because of their lack of technique. 看完节目后，他告诉我说预备队有个年轻中卫叫特里，这个小伙子将会肯定会为英格兰国 家队效力很长时间，他比那些英格兰国家队后卫强多了，那些国家队后卫根本不足以对抗 其他欧洲球队，因为他们缺乏技术。 On Saturday against Israel, the technical question continued to haunt the nation. It was at full-back. 周六对阵以色列的比赛，技术问题仍在困扰着我们的国家队，这次不仅仅是中卫，整个后 防都存在这个问题。 Right-back! Compare Phil Neville to Cafu in his pomp, to Zambrotta in the World Cup, to Willie Sagnol, to Philipp Lahm, to Lassana Diarra. 首先是右后卫！就拿出场的菲利普－内维尔和巅峰时期的卡福去比比看吧，或者是世界杯 上的赞布罗塔，或者萨尼奥尔、拉姆以及我们切尔西的迪亚拉。 Left-back! Compare Jamie Carragher to Ashley Cole, to Wayne Bridge, to Grosso in the World Cup, to Maldini or Roberto Carlos in their pomp, to Philipp Lahm. 再说左后卫！拿卡拉格去与阿什利－科尔、布里吉比比吧，或者是世界杯上的格罗索，或 是巅峰时期的马尔蒂尼和卡洛斯，或者是拉姆。 (To be fair, this is no comment on Carragher or Neville in their normal positions). （为了确保公平，对於卡拉格或内维尔经常踢的位置我们就不做评论了。） When Jose Mourinho has needed a Plan B this season, he hasn't replaced a right-back with a right-back as Steve McClaren did when Micah Richards came on and was no improvement at all on Neville. 本赛季当穆帅需要执行B计划的时候，他并没有用另一名右后卫换右后卫。不过麦克拉伦却 换了，他用里查兹换下内维尔，但场上局势并没有什麽改观。 He has put Michael Essien there and attacked. Or, at home to Tottenham, he went three at the back and introduced Shaun Wright-Phillips. 穆帅则是把埃辛放在了右后卫的位置让他进攻。在主场对阵热刺的比赛中，他甚至把小赖 特放在了这个位置上。 Here's a surprise! The last England manager to do something like that was Sven- Goran Eriksson. In the pre-World Cup friendly against Argentina, when 2-1 down, he took off Gary Neville, put Steven Gerrard right-back, brought on Joe Cole and won 3-2. Gerrard crossed for one of the goals. 这太意外了！上任英格兰主帅埃里克松也有过类似的手笔。在世界杯之前对阵阿根廷的友 谊赛上，当英格兰1：2落后时，他换下加里－内维尔，换上乔－科尔，并让杰拉德打右后 卫，最后他们3：2反超，杰拉德奉献了一次助攻。 In the World Cup he used the same trick and moved David Beckham to right-back in order to introduce Aaron Lennon. Beckham crossed for one of the goals. 世界杯上，他又用了这招，换上了列农，然后把贝克汉姆调到右后卫，之后贝克汉姆助攻 队友破门。 In top international football your full-backs have to be technicians who can be crucial to attacks just as they have to be defensively top dogs. For years, England have been men down when going forward. 在这些国际的顶级赛事里，你的后卫必须具备良好的技术，因为他们的进攻往往是致命的 ，就如同他们出色的防守一样。但这些年来，英格兰在进攻中总是缺少后卫的支持。 Personally, I think Gary Neville is deficient when going forward, and that has been a problem for England. It may be a reason why Manchester United have mostly under-performed in the Champions League. But Neville at least is an outstanding defender. 我个人认为，加里－内维尔的攻击水平并不高，这一直是英格兰队的一个难题。这也许也 可以解释曼联在冠军杯上为什麽总是表现不佳，但至少内维尔是一位出色的后卫。 On Saturday, it cried out for quality at full-back. Every England game it does. The country normally has it on the left, and will do so again on Wednesday when Ashley Cole returns from suspension. 周六的比赛，后卫线上的问题再次暴露无疑，英格兰的每一场比赛都是如此。队伍的左路 是正常的，本周三阿什利－科尔停赛后解禁复出会再次稳定英格兰的左路防线。 But who to play on the right? Not Neville! Not Richards! 但是谁来踢右后卫？不能是内维尔！也不能是里查兹！ Owen Hargreaves? He has played there a lot for Bayern Munich, but maybe hasn't provided a lot of attacking options. Steven Gerrard? Crazy! How could we put the country's second best attacking midfielder there! If you believe the English journalists it is better to drop Frank Lampard and play Gerrard through the middle. 哈格里夫斯？他在拜仁踢过很多次右后卫，但估计对进攻不会有太大帮助。杰拉德？这个 想法太疯狂了！如果你相信那些英国媒体所谓放弃兰帕德，派上杰拉德在中场的话，我们 怎麽能让排在英格兰最佳攻击中场第二位的球员去踢右后卫！ Well, actually, I think Steven Gerrard is the best right-back England has. I think he could be our Cafu. I remember him winning the Uefa Cup at right-back for Liverpool in 2001, and the FA Cup the same season. Their creative midfielder then was Gary McAllister. 不过事实上，我认为杰拉德是英格兰最好的右后卫选择，我相信他能成为我们的卡福。我 还记得2001年他为利物浦捧起了联盟杯奖杯，而那时他踢的就是右后卫，那一年他还获得 了足总杯冠军，而当时利物浦的中场是富有创造性的球星加利－麦卡里斯特。 If you played a tucked-in right-sided midfielder to give him room to go forward - Jenas, unfortunately, is the best one in the squad, but outside it you have Bentley at Blackburn and that guy at Chelsea who has been intrinsic in destroying Sheffield United and Tottenham in his last two Premiership games from the right of midfield, Shaun Wright-Phillips - then you're building a team with cutting edge and ability. 如果你想在右路占据主动，那麽中场右路球员就必须有能力为右后卫创造更多进攻的空间 ——杰纳斯，不幸的是，他是球队最出色的球员（不能总放在右路），不过此外你还可以 使用布莱克本的本特利，在过去的两场英超比赛里，他在中场右路连续击败了谢联和热刺 ，此外还有小赖特——这样你就可以组成一支具备出色进攻能力的球队了。 Of course, the hacks like to lay in to our Frank. Why they let off Wayne Rooney whose England record is far inferior is a mystery. 当然，批评的声音好像对对准了我们的兰帕德，而奇怪的是为什麽他们就对国家队表现一 贯糟糕的鲁尼视而不见？ England lacks a top front man and there's nothing that can be done about that, but Italy won the World Cup with Luca Toni in attack and Totti supporting, so maybe it's not necessary. 英格兰在前锋线上人才匮乏，对此我们无能为力，不过看看赢得世界杯的意大利，他们在 前锋线上拥有托尼，同时托蒂也支持着锋线，因此也许这个原因并不是最主要的。 Of course, I'm just a journalist, so who am I to have my say. I should just stick with reporting the facts. 当然，我也只是个记者而已，我只是说出我要说的，我只会用事实说话。 Therefore, here they are. Frank Lampard scored a brilliant goal at Barcelona this season. In the Champions League he scored two brilliant quarter-final goals at home to Bayern Munich and a brilliant semi-final goal at home to Monaco. He was England's top scorer in the qualifying rounds for the World Cup. He has scored 20 goals for Chelsea this season and one for England. 因此，以下这些就是事实：兰帕德在本赛季对阵巴萨的时候攻入一粒精彩进球；冠军杯1/4 决赛主场对阵拜仁的比赛中，他同样攻入两粒精彩进球，半决赛对阵摩纳哥他也打入精彩 进球。他是世界杯预选赛阶段英格兰的最佳射手，本赛季他为切尔西攻入20粒进球，为英 格兰打入一粒进球。这就是事实。 Wayne Rooney has not scored in his last 15 competitive England matches. 而鲁尼在最近英格兰的15场比赛里还没有过破门。 And now, as it's a columnist's job to assess and conclude from research and facts, I'm going to do that. 现在，我要去象评论员那样去对这些事实进行评价和总结： Lampard must play. Whatever the statistics, Rooney must play. And Gerrard must play. The manager must find a way of making it work. 兰帕德必须上场，不管鲁尼之前资料如何，鲁尼也必须上场，杰拉德同样必须上场。主教 练必须想办法把他们融合在一起。 Finally, a note to all journalists who say that Lampard and Gerrard can't play together. Jose Mourinho disagrees with you. That's why he tried to sign Gerrard twice! 最后，再提醒那些认为兰帕德和杰拉德不能共存的记者们，我们的穆帅不同意你们的看法 ，这也是为什麽他曾两次试图签下杰拉德的原因。 -- 相当篇颇的一篇文章 不过我想蓝怕得还是别去踢国家队了 每次回来後射门就整个软啪啪无力 把他在俱乐部的状态都搞滥了 ........ --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.112.212.27 ※ 编辑: Santos 来自: 140.112.212.27 (03/27 13:13)