Tactical Reflections on Arsenal by Red Detective Goonertalk http://goo.gl/dhoJI ※注：这篇是该作者写在 4/19 即与 Liverpool 以 1-1 踢平之後。 It’s no wonder Arsenal are able to draw so many penaltieds with their flicky-flicky football and repeated 1-2′s. Sure the style draws fouls, but so often it looks incredibly narrow and like a long shot that it can create a goal. How many seasons now have critics said we are trying to score the perfect goal? 难怪 Arsenal 有本事得到这麽多点球机会，正是因为一直传球的球风以及不住地用二过 一策略。这样的球风确实可以赚来不少罚球的机会，但也未免太频繁以至於看上去就只有 这套策略，即使远射可以得分也要传球。多少赛季以来，数不清的批评指出我们只愿踢进 漂亮的进球。 I am not proposing a complete adjustment of the style but unless you take enough shots, then you don’t force errors, create opportunities or force some luck. Cristiano Ronaldo would not have beaten Gomes had he not have shot. The worst thing I’ve heard is the management are considering letting Rosicky leave to be replaced with Hleb for his second spell. I think the Czech should be allowed to move on but signing a player renowned above all others for not shooting makes my eyes water. 我不是有意要整个球风进行大刀阔斧般的改革，但好歹要有够多的射门数，这样你才不会 受迫而失误，而是创造机会、甚至踢进幸运的一球。不射门的 Christian Ronaldo 也没 办法击败 Gomes。最近传闻最令我诧异的是，管理层考虑放走 Rosicky 而采用 Hleb 来 接替他踢下个赛季。我想，这名捷克人若要主动离开是不会被阻止的，但是却签下以不射 门而称着的球员，那我一定会欲哭无泪。 The fullbacks, Clichy and Eboue, gave the width for parts of the game but it looked as though the Liverpool defenders could handle head height crosses all day long bar one corner Koscielny nearly scored from. What’s the bottom line? Van Persie is not a last man forward. Numerous interceptions made from his feet because their defenders knew he does not have the pace to run beyond. It reminded me of the FA Cup final against Manchester United, which we ultimately won. With Bergkamp unable to beat Rio Ferdinand for pace, he did what Skrtel did. 边後卫 Clichy 和 Eboue 增加了比赛中进攻的多样性，但他们的传中吊球看上去都能被 Liverpool 的後卫群瓦解，除了 Koscielny 几乎顶进的角球进攻。结果是什麽？Van Persie 却无法负责成为最後起脚的前锋。Liverpool 的防守球员不停地截断 Van Persie 的球，为的是不让他有持球冲刺的机会。这让我想起以前在 FA Cup 与 ManUtd 的比赛，最後是我们赢了。那一次 Bergkamp 无法用冲刺来击败 对方的後卫 Rio Ferdinand，而 Rio 当时所做的正和这次的後卫 Skrtel 所做的一样。 I’d like to see Arsenal with Van Persie running on to neat lay offs from a player ahead of him not running behind. He’s a fantastic goalscorer, but not suited to the attrition and warfare of roughing it alongside the rough henchmen of the league. Should someone as brittle be battling with Terry, Vidic, Skrtel or should he be given a free role to link play in behind someone physical enough to bully those players and outpace them? The risk is he would become a luxury player in this role. Maybe he is unable to track back and tackle as effectively as, say, a Fabregas or a Nasri in the role. If that is true then might Van Persie be the wrong player tactically? I do not say this is what I think, I seek to discuss a way of deploying him more efficiently. 我喜欢看着 Arsenal 球队中 Van Persie 潇洒地摆脱前方的後卫，而不是看他跑得比较 快。他是个令人眼睛为之一亮的射手，但不适合肩负着施压及对抗英超的硬汉後卫群。该 让一个容易较脆弱且易伤的球员去对抗 Terry、Vidic、Skrtel 吗？还是该让他来踢进攻 中场来支援负责扛住前线且较壮硕的前锋，并让後卫疲於奔命呢？把他放在这样的位置确 实太浪费了。或许他无法像 Fabregas 或 Nasri 在担任进攻中场时还能追逐并有效率地 铲球。若前锋和进攻中场都不太适合 Van Persie，是否成为战术中被错误使用的球员呢 ？我不太愿意承认这是我的想法，只求能看到更有效率使用他的战术。 Another player I would like to consider is Abou Diaby. He gave Arsenal a power and physicality they miss greatly. His ability to move through tackling midfielders is superb, and yet, I still groan when he is in the side. Why? He doesn’t step up and perform in the massive games. Wilshere, Nasri and Fabregas have all given big performances on big stages at various times (though not lately). The times I get frustrated with Diaby is when Arsenal’s attacking midfielders are straddling the thirty yard line trying to penetrate a stubborn defence. He continually slows the game down, allowing any decent organised outfit to realign to any space made by the player who has passed to him. Watching Barcelona, Manchester United, Real Madrid and Arsenal at their peak you see how vital the speed of tempo is against such a tactic. 另外一名同样成为我的疑问的球员，就是 Abou Diaby。他带给 Arsenal 所欠缺的力量和 体格。能漂亮地抢走对方中场脚下的球，但我还是对於他出现在阵容而感到痛苦。为什麽 呢？在大部分的赛事中，他无法提升推进的速度以及有效率的执行力。Wilshere、Nasri 、以及 Fabregas 在许多时候都能在关键一刻做出漂亮的执行力（虽然最近表现较差了些 ）。我对 Diaby 感到困惑的时候，正是当 Arsenal 的进攻中场要来个跨越三十码的快速 反击来穿越对方顽强的防线之际。他却一再地拖慢节奏，只要有人传给他，他就会礼貌地 让对方不急不徐地组织好防线。看看 Barca、ManUtd、Real Madrid、以及 Arsenal 在关 键时刻的漂亮表现，你就会体认到比赛节奏也是击败对手的重要策略。 What is more, it seems like it has been an age waiting for Diaby to truly arrive at the highest level. It’s been many years that Diaby has flattered to deceive that he would become the all action match winner he could be. 更甚的是，看来又要再给 Diaby 一年的机会来瞧瞧他是否真的能开窍。已经给他太多时 间，让他自命非凡，甚至认为有朝一日会成为关键球员。 Diaby divides fans into two camps; those that say he is not good enough and those that say he possesses the natural athletic prowess to win games by himself. I am waiting for that player to arrive; and not against Newcastle, West Ham or Everton but against Chelsea, United or Tottenham. For surely that has to be the standard, a group of players individually and collaboratively capable of dominating top matches. Let’s see if he can deliver on Wednesday, and show what he is all about. Diaby 也让球迷分成两个阵营：一群认为他踢得不够好，而另一群认为他拥有天生的球技 足以赢下比赛。我正期待这样的球员赶快加入，不是对上 Newcastle、West Ham、或 Everton 才拿出看家本领，而是对上 Chelsea、ManUtd、或 Tottenham 的时候发挥能力 。当然那也得需要一定的程度，即是整个球队中，球员们不但要有好的个人能力以及团队 合作才能主宰关键的赛事。让我们瞧瞧若是 Diaby 能在周三上场的话，看看他的表现如 何。 ＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊ 这篇翻译的有点太晚，(￣□￣|||)a 所以供枪迷们做参考。 Goal! Goal! Arsenal! We r the Champions ! --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 1.168.0.115