※ 引述《rhead (Tedious)》之銘言： : 以下是一些教授的回應 : 1. Thank you for your interest. I receive dozens of student inquiries, but your : statement is very well written, and your experiences and interests are very : in-line with my own. You also have a lot of field experiences, which I highly : value. I strongly encourage you to apply to not only Env. Studies, but also : Geography (deadline Dec 1). : Do you have any funding? : 我回了一些客套話並說我會申請另一個program 還有我沒有funding : 就沒有下文了 先查一下這個教授在Geography有沒joint appointment 根據字面上應該蠻有意思的，只是可能在funding上有些限制 : 2.I appreciate your interest in our program. We have a variety of research : efforts in the surface flux / urban environment area, involving a number of : faculty members. We look forward to reviewing your application. : 這間學校只有寄個這個教授 當然SOP裡只有提到他(申請資料中的SOP還有提到另外兩個 : 教授) 很妙的是 他也把我寄給他的信轉給另外兩個老師 至少表示我沒選錯老師 : 一樣回了一些客套話 就沒有下文了 很客套的回應，應該是對你沒特別的興趣 : 3.Thank you very much for your email and interest in our research program. : You have an excellent academic background. At the present time I am waiting : to here back on funding opportunities/decisions so I'm not able to offer a : position at this time. However, I would encourage you to apply to our graduate : program in Land and Atmospheric Science (www.laas.umn.edu). There is a : possibility that you could receive a scholarship. In the meantime, I will : contact you immediately if I receive good news about research funding. : 我回了 已經申請好了 期待可以跟他一起工作之類的 才寄信沒多久 也不知道會回我啥 : 我的經驗是 寫信聯絡有回信的比例還蠻高的 但是好像都沒有直接的結果或是進一步的 : 討論 又或是直接拒絕我XD 不過至少我有吸引到他們的注意吧 能多點心思看我的申請 : 資料感覺就不錯 我想請問一下我收到這些回應是好不好呢? submmit之後 很空虛啊!! 看來他建議你去申請LAAS，那就去申請吧，機率應該很高 話說這幾封e-mail都寫得很straightforward.. 應該不太需要翻譯吧.. -- 如果能在開滿了梔子花的山坡上 與你相遇 如果能 眷地愛過一次再別離 那麼 再長久的一生 不也就只是 就只是 回首時 那短短的一瞬 --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 116.87.86.19