※ 引述《vengerov (New Yorker)》之銘言： : 請問像是柴可夫斯基這類大賽的評分方式怎麼樣呢？ : 是像是台灣以分數計算嘛？ : 去頭去尾再平均？ : 或是每個評審有一定的票數投給前三名 再依照票數決定？ : 在美國讀書jury都是以A+ A B+這些標準 : 但我覺得這不適合比賽 因為大家都是A+的水準 : 煩請知道的人介紹一下各個大賽的評分方式 謝謝！ 官網都會寫標準，今年柴可夫斯基大賽的規則 http://tchaikovskycompetition.com/en/rules/ 器樂類: I ROUND Jury members shall be independent and not have own students in the competition. In principle results shall not be a matter of arrangement and/or discussion between jury members, they shall however be a compromise of individual and clear statements of each jury member about each contestant. By the explained voting system clear results will be achieved. Any discussion about procedures or results and especially any revoting are not subject of these jury rules. To achieve these goals, the following jury rules apply: a) After Round I, each jury member will cast 12 names without ranking, who she/he wants to hear again in Round II. Those сontestants with a majority of votes will pass on to Round II. b) Then each jury member will be needed to vote for the second time, now giving points between 0 and 25. This vote is taken into account only in case of a tie in the bottom line: the tied contestant (s) with bigger accumulation of points will pass on. Votes a) given to contestants not passing to Round II will be disclosed upon announcing the results. To avoid any influence on further voting, all votes a) and b) given to the passing contestants will be kept confidentially to everybody, including the jury. Results will be made available one hour after the last performance of Round I. Jury members will then be available to explain their voting directly to those who failed to pass to the next round. II ROUND a) The same procedure applies; however now each judge will give only 6 names without ranking. Those 6 with majority of votes will pass on further. b) Then each jury member will be needed to vote for the second time (see the same procedure in Round I). Again, this vote is taken into account only in case of a tie in the bottom line: the tied candidate (s) with the bigger accumulation of points will pass on. Votes a) given to contestants not passing to the next round will be disclosed after announcing the results. To avoid any influence on further voting, all votes a) and b) given to the passing contestants will be kept confidentially to everybody, including the jury. Results will be made available one hour after the last performance of Round II. Jury members will then be available to explain their voting directly to those who failed to pass to the next round. III Round Each judge will now rank the 6 finalists in her/his own preference; the accumulated minority of votes will determine the ranking of the finalists. Evaluation method: rank 1 = 1 point, rank 2 = 2 points, etc. In case of a tie, the place of a finalist is determined by the total number of points b) accumulated in the two previous rounds voting. For the decision with regard to final prizes, the jury must consider all the performances throughout the Competition. The 1st Prize/Gold Medal (the tied vote is unacceptable) can be awarded by a majority of votes (with a deciding vote of at least 8 out of 11). For special prices each judge will give one name; prices will be decided by simple majority of votes. Jury decisions are final and not revocable. --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 169.231.1.222 ※ 文章網址: https://webptt.com/m.aspx?n=bbs/clmusic/M.1435688459.A.4DF.html