clmusic 板


LINE

※ 引述《Piaf (...)》之銘言: : There is an article about the 1887/1890 Bruckner 8th in Ben Korstvedt's : book. Worth reading.I agree with Fassbaender: this book is really a good : one, although the reviews in amazon.com are pretty terrible. The full score : of the 1887 version can be achieved in Schott-Eulenberg Miniature Scores : edition (USD 25). I must clarify my review of Prof. Korstvedt's book. First, it's a good book for those who are interested in the background of this master piece (Bruckner's 8th), since Prof. Korstvedt followed a rigorous method to investigate the problems behind this symphony. In this book readers can find several tabulated data, plenty references, and clear argument. However, I am not completely convinced by Prof. Korstvedt's argument about the Haas edition. It is widely known that Haas's Edition is based on the 1890 manuscript, inserted some material by 1887 version. But, (and this is a BIG BUT), Prof. Korstvedt used some exaggerate terms when describing this which is terribly misleading. For example, he wrote: "his edition does not include any scholarly apparatus nor does the introduction adequately explain this edtorial intervention." He also applied some patriotic terms to strengthen his argument against Haas edition, and this should not have happened in an academic article. He tends to link Prof. Robert Haas to the Nazi Party, and National Socialism, then went to conclude ...what so ever, and finally he implied that the Haas edition should be forbidden. I cannot agree this at all. Most people would agree Haas edition still has its meaning in the studies of Bruckner's music. (The American people are more patriotic then you can imagine. You can almost see the TV programs blameing on those who they regard as "Center of EVIL", "TYRANT", and "NOTORIOUS BARBARIANS" every day. Terrible!) Therefore, when you are reading this book, don't forget to read Deryck Cooke and Robert Simpson's book, to get a fair balance on the Haas/Nowak issue. I know I went too far from the title that I initially set. Maybe I can end this series of article by correctting another mis-labeled recording. Karl Boehm/VPO/Bruckner Symphony no. 8 (1977, DG Gallery Series) Actually it's Nowak Edition, not Haas edition as printed on the back cover. -- Piaf @ PTT; klem/Dutchman elsewhere. ※ 編輯: Piaf 來自: 204.39.226.207 (02/08 11:31) ※ 編輯: Piaf 來自: 204.39.227.67 (02/08 12:31)







like.gif 您可能會有興趣的文章
icon.png[問題/行為] 貓晚上進房間會不會有憋尿問題
icon.pngRe: [閒聊] 選了錯誤的女孩成為魔法少女 XDDDDDDDDDD
icon.png[正妹] 瑞典 一張
icon.png[心得] EMS高領長版毛衣.墨小樓MC1002
icon.png[分享] 丹龍隔熱紙GE55+33+22
icon.png[問題] 清洗洗衣機
icon.png[尋物] 窗台下的空間
icon.png[閒聊] 双極の女神1 木魔爵
icon.png[售車] 新竹 1997 march 1297cc 白色 四門
icon.png[討論] 能從照片感受到攝影者心情嗎
icon.png[狂賀] 賀賀賀賀 賀!島村卯月!總選舉NO.1
icon.png[難過] 羨慕白皮膚的女生
icon.png閱讀文章
icon.png[黑特]
icon.png[問題] SBK S1安裝於安全帽位置
icon.png[分享] 舊woo100絕版開箱!!
icon.pngRe: [無言] 關於小包衛生紙
icon.png[開箱] E5-2683V3 RX480Strix 快睿C1 簡單測試
icon.png[心得] 蒼の海賊龍 地獄 執行者16PT
icon.png[售車] 1999年Virage iO 1.8EXi
icon.png[心得] 挑戰33 LV10 獅子座pt solo
icon.png[閒聊] 手把手教你不被桶之新手主購教學
icon.png[分享] Civic Type R 量產版官方照無預警流出
icon.png[售車] Golf 4 2.0 銀色 自排
icon.png[出售] Graco提籃汽座(有底座)2000元誠可議
icon.png[問題] 請問補牙材質掉了還能再補嗎?(台中半年內
icon.png[問題] 44th 單曲 生寫竟然都給重複的啊啊!
icon.png[心得] 華南紅卡/icash 核卡
icon.png[問題] 拔牙矯正這樣正常嗎
icon.png[贈送] 老莫高業 初業 102年版
icon.png[情報] 三大行動支付 本季掀戰火
icon.png[寶寶] 博客來Amos水蠟筆5/1特價五折
icon.pngRe: [心得] 新鮮人一些面試分享
icon.png[心得] 蒼の海賊龍 地獄 麒麟25PT
icon.pngRe: [閒聊] (君の名は。雷慎入) 君名二創漫畫翻譯
icon.pngRe: [閒聊] OGN中場影片:失蹤人口局 (英文字幕)
icon.png[問題] 台灣大哥大4G訊號差
icon.png[出售] [全國]全新千尋侘草LED燈, 水草

請輸入看板名稱,例如:BabyMother站內搜尋

TOP