※ 引述《KarateWu (慢郎中)》之銘言： : Actually, "good service" and "good price" are not always controversal, : especially if the shops "dare" share all information about this feild with : customers honsetly but try hard to suck buyers' pocket and do the brain-washing : by all kinds of commericals. 這種無謂的高調就可以省省了。 在資訊開放的地方，比價人人都會，但是價格戰並不是唯一的營運指南。而且我也 講得很清楚，"theoretically"。這個論點的基礎很簡單: service costs。 除非你能夠拿什麼學理來證明服務可以無成本地進行，否則，在其他變因皆得到控制 的情境下，good service 與 good price 之間有相當程度的排斥關係。 至於服務要做到怎樣的程度、價格可以低到怎樣的程度，這是車店自己權衡斟酌。 如果你仍然要抱持著 "賣方會無所不用其極地掏我口袋" 的心態來跟車店打交道， 那麼你應該抱著資本論上街頭革命還比較實際。 : Obviously, I am not like someone who works for bike-shops. What "i" am doing : is just let you know that you pay the price you deserve espeically in : the place like Taiwan and the feild like the bike. 上面這段話未免太託大了。從你之前對於其他人提到零售店向車廠進貨的平均成本 數字嗤之以鼻的反應，就可以知道你對於這個產業有多外行。說句坦白話，倘若 真的聽你的意見為參考，無異於問道於盲。 : If you are reaching a : certain model of bikes, try to ask several different shops and cut the price : within 10-20% off to the owner(remerber, not clerks). At least, don't let the : owners think you are a typical uncle sam with truthly deep pocket. To the : shops with Gaint signboard, you msut keep that in mind. 有商業規模的買者會以量議價。 有人際手腕的買者會以交情商價。 自行具備技術的老手不必倚賴車店，可以多方詢價比價。 唯有無知的買者會走進店裡，天真到以為找老闆亂殺一通就可以打到八折。 言盡於此。 -- - Mjolnyr - Hamarr, helga ve veita ok hindra alla illska. --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.71.81.91 ※ 編輯: Mjolnyr 來自: 61.71.81.91 (08/16 03:03)