作者daze (一期一會)
看板ask-why
標題About Placebo...
時間Thu Mar 26 02:09:08 2009
Placebo似乎沒有想像中那麼大的效果。
Cochrane Library 的一篇Review:
《Placebo interventions for all clinical conditions》
(
http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/
CD003974/frame.html 縮址:
http://0rz.tw/LUu02 )
Abstract:
Plain language summary
It has been widely believed that placebo (dummy) treatments (for example
sugar tablets) are associated with substantial effects on a wide range of
health problems. However, this belief is not based on evidence from
randomised trials that use a placebo treatment for one group of people, while
another group receives no treatment. The effect of placebo treatments was
studied by reviewing more than 150 such trials covering many types of
healthcare problems. Placebo treatments caused no major health benefits,
although they possibly had a small effect on outcomes reported by patients,
for example pain.
Background
Placebo interventions are often claimed to improve patient-reported and
observer-reported outcomes, but this belief is not based on evidence from
randomised trials that compare placebo with no treatment.
Objectives
To assess the effect of placebo interventions.
Search strategy
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The
Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2002), MEDLINE (1966 to 2002), EMBASE (1980 to
2002), Biological Abstracts (1986 to 2002), and PsycLIT (1887 to 2002). We
contacted experts on placebo research, and read references in the included
trials.
Selection criteria
We included randomised placebo trials with a no-treatment control group
investigating any health problem.
Data collection and analysis
Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.
We contacted study authors for additional information.
Main results
Outcome data were available in 156 out of 182 included trials, investigating
46 clinical conditions.
We found no statistically significant pooled effect of placebo in 38 studies
with binary outcomes (4284 patients), relative risk 0.95 (95% confidence
interval (CI) 0.89 to 1.01). The pooled relative risk for patient-reported
outcomes was 0.95 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.03) and for observer-reported outcomes
0.91 (95% CI 0.81 to 1.03). There was heterogeneity (P=0.01) but the funnel
plot was symmetrical. There was no statistically significant effect of
placebo interventions in the four clinical conditions investigated in three
trials or more: pain, nausea, smoking, and depression, but confidence
intervals were wide.
We found an overall effect of placebo treatments in 118 trials with
continuous outcomes (7453 patients), standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.24
(95% CI -0.31 to -0.17). The SMD for patient-reported outcomes was -0.30 (95%
CI -0.38 to -0.21), whereas no statistically significant effect was found for
observer-reported outcomes, SMD -0.10 (95% CI -0.20 to -0.01). There was
heterogeneity (P<0.001) and large variability in funnel plot results even for
big trials. There was an apparent effect of placebo interventions on pain
(SMD -0.25 (95% CI -0.35 to-0.16)), and phobia (SMD -0.63 (95% CI -1.17 to
-0.08)); but also a substantial risk of bias. There was no statistically
significant effect of placebo interventions in eight other clinical
conditions investigated in three trials or more: nausea, smoking, depression,
overweight, asthma, hypertension, insomnia and anxiety, but confidence
intervals were wide.
Authors' conclusions
There was no evidence that placebo interventions in general have clinically
important effects. A possible small effect on continuous patient-reported
outcomes, especially pain, could not be clearly distinguished from bias.
--
看哪,這論證是極好的:蘇格拉底是人,凡造物都難免要朽壞,所以末了我們知道,蘇格
拉底總要落到死裡面了。從亞里士多德以來的每一個邏輯學家,沒有一個不歡喜這個論證
的。亞里士多德明白的告訴了我們論證形式的道理,因了這個緣故,我們便尊他為邏輯學
的王。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
※ 編輯: daze 來自: 140.112.212.171 (03/26 02:28)
1F:推 Equalmusic:這真有趣...不過 placebo 測試會用在那些病人身上阿 03/26 03:09
2F:→ Equalmusic:總不會人家快死了你還用安慰劑去做實驗吧 XD 03/26 03:09
3F:推 Equalmusic:另外常常說如果有「求生意志」的話病就比較容易好 03/26 03:12
4F:→ Equalmusic:這種說法有根據嗎? 03/26 03:12
5F:推 Oikeiosis:所以這篇文章其實滿屌的 找到這麼多敢做no treatment 03/26 03:19
6F:→ Oikeiosis:的地方 而且是拿安慰劑跟什麼也不幹兩者對照 03/26 03:19
有些study有"給藥"、"給Placebo"、"no treatment"三個組。
然後被這篇拿出Placebo跟no treatment的資料做分析。
※ 編輯: daze 來自: 140.112.212.171 (03/26 03:34)
7F:推 Oikeiosis:這還是很屌啊 醫生要怎麼跟病人說他就是不給任何治療 03/26 03:41
8F:→ Oikeiosis:而且還有幾千個臨床病例耶 總覺得很不可思議 03/26 03:43
9F:推 behemoth:給一樓E大,通常都是在病人很多,而且需要分批治療的時候 03/26 10:17
10F:→ behemoth:會進行這樣的實驗,把輪到治療的病人當做實驗組,尚在等 03/26 10:17
11F:→ behemoth:侯的病人當做對照組來進行 03/26 10:18
12F:推 Oikeiosis:你是說對主訴疼痛、憂鬱的病患 告訴他們排隊還沒輪到 03/26 15:51
13F:→ Oikeiosis:聽起來彷彿可行 但是想想又很難跟裡面的分類相配合 03/26 15:52