這篇是 12/6 的文章，所以請搭配 12/5、6 Q&A 服用 我只是想翻個人任務相關的回答而已 wwww - individual missions (I translated the name from Russian IBZ – individualnye boyevye zadachi) were official renamed to “personal missions” individual missions 更名為 personal missions （譯：反正都翻成一點也不『個人』的個人任務） - Q: “personal missions are there not for your fun, but to make you play it a longer!” A: “Yes, we’ll make you by force! By pointing submachine guns at you!” Q:「個人任務根本不是做出來娛樂的，而是逼你玩久一點！」A:「沒錯！我們還會拿槍抵 著你的頭逼你玩！」 - Storm explains the presence of platoon requirements in personal missions: “ The name is personal missions, not individual. There are generally only a few missions with platoon requirement. Platoons = socializing. A player who is socializing plays significantly longer.” Storm 解釋組排限制的存在意義：「這是個人任務，不是單人任務。基本上也只有少數 任務需要組排。組排就是交流，會交流的玩家明顯地會玩的比較久。」 - it’s apparently not possible to move the names of tanks on the improved minimap to the left from the icon, as it cause graphic glitches 無法把小地圖上的車名移到標誌左邊；會造成繪圖錯誤 - a render range rectangle was not implemented into the new map because it will change to a circle relatively soon （舊聞，略） - viewrange circle was not implemented because it exists as a mod anyway and who really wants it can use a mod 不做視距圈的原因在於已經有MOD了，想用的人請去裝MOD - FV4005 characteristics are not final FV4005 的數據還會改 - there is a serious (and common) bug on test server, where – after you quit the battle – you see that battle’s minimap in the hangar (SS: and you can watch how the battle is going in the hangar, actually I think it would be a neat feature) （測試服的 bug，略） - Storm thinks that the platoon requirement for missions is final Storm 認為任務的組排限制已是定稿 - Storm confirms that the Mittengard map is lowtier only (SS: why the hell does it have an encounter mode then) and that Gost Town will not appear in random battles （舊聞，略） - Storm states that you don’t have to play artillery to complete the personal missions （舊聞，略） - Storm commenting about players raging that they have to platoon for the personal missions: “Yea, it’s the righteous anger because in order to get the reward, you will actually have to make some effort. Everyone just wants free stuff.” Storm 評論玩家怒反組排限制的情況：「要求他們為了獎賞而做些努力；對此憤恨不平還 真是好棒棒。大家都只想要躺著領免費禮物。」 - Q: “Forced socialization sucks!” A: “Tell that to the Blizzard guys.” Q:「強迫交流遜斃了」A:「跟玻璃渣抱怨去」 - Q: “Why can’t you make the missions pop in automatically, like achievements?” A: “We don’t want to have players ‘getting the missions’ just so. In order to get the tank and other rewards, you will have to make a certain effort. If you are too lazy to make the effort, you can continue playing like you did without paying heed to the missions.” Q:「為啥不將個人任務設為自動啟動？」A:「我們不想讓玩家不知不覺下完成任務。想獲 得獎賞總要做些努力；若你懶得去手動啟動，大可當這任務不存在繼續開心玩。」 - Storm states that WG doesn’t want to implement lighter and lighter tanks without armor. It’s just that “choosing future branches is a complicated question.” Storm 表示不想做更輕的無裝甲戰車。因為「規劃未來的科技樹是個複雜的問題。」 （譯者：不是很懂這條想表達什麼…） - Storm confirms that the missions are not balanced yet 個人任務數據尚未平衡 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/06/storm-qa-2/ -- In church, they say to forgive! Forgiveness is between them and God; it's my job to arrange the meeting. 《 Man on Fire 》 --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.235.228.200 ※ 文章網址: http://webptt.com/m.aspx?n=bbs/WoT/M.1418048366.A.E8D.html 請勿罵髒話 T-55A：http://youtu.be/WDsxsNjz64c?list=UUQWHq9e1hN268yjgYq-0hNw ※ 編輯: WillieHuang (36.235.217.56), 12/09/2014 15:10:11