翻完才發現有人發了，以後沒人翻再翻好了XD 原始連結如下 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/05/5-8-2013/#more-1422 正文 - looks like Russian players playing on EU server want the “Stalin” inscriptions back. SerB reacts: “Write an appeal to the appropriate office, that’ll be more useful. 看來似乎在EU伺服器的俄羅斯完家希望史達林的標語能夠恢復。 SerB表示：請向正確的單位上訴會比較有用。 - WoT is influenced by real life politics too: for example in China, it’s forbidden to use real map on CW map WOT也被現實中的政治所影響，例如：中國伺服器的CW禁止使用以真實世界建立的地圖。 - it’s possible that when roaming is implemented, the chat will be disabled for the roaming players (SS: in order not to promote tension between players, spam etc.) – “measures against excesses from both sides will be taken” 當漫遊實施的時候，漫遊玩家的聊天功能是可能被關閉的。（SS：為了不增加玩家間的緊 張局勢、垃圾訊息等等。）－將會對雙方的過度激烈行為採取措施。 - the FV300 British light tank might be implemented FV300英軍輕坦可能會加入。 - there are not enough TD’s for US 3rd TD branch 沒有足夠的TD來製作第三條美軍TD線。 - M8 Scott won’t become US premium arty M8 Scoutt不會是美軍的金幣砲車。 - it’s possible that the Panzer V/IV icon might be reworked to reflect the vehicle better (SS: ATM it looks like a stock Panther), but this has really low priority Panzer V/IV的圖示可能重製的更接近實車（SS：目前的圖示看起來像白板豹式。），但 是優先度很低。 - Panzer V/IV model won’t be reworked anytime soon (SS: to resemble the way it really looked) Panzer V/IV的模型近期不會重製。（SS：讓它看起來更像實車的樣子。） - Q: “Why does LTP suck so much?” A: “And of course you gave a Rolls Royce to your friends on your birthday?” Q：為什麼LTP這麼爛？ A：你在你的生日送你的朋友勞斯萊斯嗎？ - disabling the chat between the two teams is not planned 關閉雙方隊伍互相聊天的系統不在計畫中。 - the balance of the lowtier premium special vehicles such as Tetrarch and Hotchkiss is monitored, but it is changed only if the need is extremely urgent 低階金幣車像是Tetrarch和Hotchkiss的平衡正在觀察中，但是只有在必要的狀況發生時 會改。 - according to SerB, WG deals with bots “normally”, their number is not growing 根據SerB表示，WG有在處理BOT玩家，BOT玩家並沒有變多。 - Q: “Will you remove huge weakspots from tanks?” A: “Don’t play tanks with huge weakspots” Q：你們會移除戰車上的大型弱點嗎？ A：不要玩有大型弱點的戰車（AKA：不爽不要玩 。）。 - Chi-Ha having bad MM? “Don’t play Chi-Ha” Chi-Ha的分房很爛？ 「不爽不要玩Chi-Ha。」 - there is no plan for now to make a new “open” (permanent) hangar á la tank proving ground 目前沒有替戰車試驗場製作一個新的開放（永久使用）車庫的計畫。（譯註：不確定我有 沒有理解錯誤。） - rare tank models being incorrect? “How terrible…” 罕見（少數）坦克的模型錯誤？ How terrible… - WoT boring? “Don’t play boring game” WOT很無聊？ 不要玩無聊的遊戲。 - German TD’s won’t come in 8.8 (despite the Soviet 2nd branch not finished) 德國TD第2線不會在8.8實裝。（因為蘇聯第2線還沒完成。）（譯註：是指蘇聯2線MT沒完 成沒錯吧？） - 3x3km maps? “When it’s done it’s done” 3乘3公里的地圖？ WIDID。 - the developers discussed the idea to allow the players to change any tank to “premium” status, but decided not to do it 開發團隊討論過允許玩家把任何戰車轉成金幣車狀態的想法，但是決定不實行。 - the 8.8 tier 9 Soviet med tank with the rear turret is not Object 430′s predecessor, but a competing project 8.8的蘇聯2線中坦T9有後置砲塔但不是Obj430的試作車（譯註：前代車種？）而是競爭計 畫的另一台車。 - Object 140 will be implemented Obj140會被加入遊戲中。 - SerB on laptop-series Radeons and the 0.8.7 FPS drops: “With Radeons it’s generally complicated. Something is being done, but no guarantees” – he suggests updating drivers 筆電使用Radeons顯示晶片在0.8.7會掉FPS，SerB：Radeons晶片系統普遍很複雜。有些地 方有改善但是不保證有用。－他建議玩家更新驅動。 - the point of lowtier premium tanks is (besides being collectibles) to significantly help new players with grinding significantly 低階金幣車的用意是在於（扣除收集用途）顯著的幫助新玩家成長。 - SerB states that WoT does have influence on how the view on history is formed by its players SerB表示WOT確實被「WOT在歷史上的觀點是由它的玩家所決定」這句話影響。（譯註：可 能有錯，歡迎改正。） - destroying the house, behind which the enemy is hiding, will not be considered as an “assist” (SerB: “Oh Cthulhu, what greedy children have we dragged here!”) 摧毀敵方戰車前方用以掩蔽的房子不算助攻。（SerB：噢，克蘇魯阿，看我們拖來了一個 多麼貪婪的孩子！） Overlord: “8.8 is going to be feature update mostly while 8.9 will bring some very exciting content.” Ovelord：8.8將會是特色更新，8.9則會帶來一些刺激的內容。 The_Chieftain (US developer): “It is possible that the T29 mantlet is only 203 mm from a preliminary measurement “ The_Chieftain (US開發人員)：初步測量T29的炮盾可能只有203mm。（譯注：NERF意味濃 厚。） --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.231.145.133 ※ 編輯: tomwei34 來自: 61.231.145.133 (08/05 18:43) ※ 編輯: tomwei34 來自: 61.231.145.133 (08/05 18:49)