Spurs execute thanks to experience Charley Rosen / Special to FOXSports.com Posted: 1 day ago Despite the relatively narrow margin, San Antonio's 108-100 win over Utah was as simple as A-B-C. A. Utah's (lack of) defense The success of the Spurs' ball- and player-movement on offense demonstrated how slow and indecisive Utah's baseline rotations were. The main culprit in this regard was Carlos Boozer, whose confusion led to a pair of layups by Fabricio Oberto and one by Francisco Elson. Nor did the Jazz provide sufficient help when Tony Parker took Deron Williams to the hole. Like those of Parker, Manu Ginobili's forays hoopward were unstoppable. Layups, floaters, even finishes with his right hand were all available for Ginobili with little opposition. Using screen/rolls, slipped screens, curls off weak-side screens, dive cuts, back-door cuts, penetrations and pitch-outs ─ the Spurs opened up the game by scoring easy points without having to resort to their outside shooting. Then there was Tim Duncan, whose inside presence was more than the Jazz could handle. To discourage the Jazz from double-teaming Duncan on his catches, the Spurs sent a variety of sequential cutters through the lane, forcing erstwhile helpers to stay home or yield layups. Even when Utah attempted a zone formation, their baseline coverage was easily befuddled and Duncan wound up with a dunk. The Jazz were so rattled that they made the most fundamental of mistakes. Like Matt Harpring neglecting to box out Duncan as he shot and missed a free throw. The result was still another Duncan dunk. When Utah's defense became paint-conscious, Manu Ginobili, Tony Parker, and Michael Finley made them pay dearly with long-range bombs. The Spurs also took full advantage of Utah's inattentive transition defense. B. Spurs' defense The Spurs' interior defense was so overwhelming that Utah simply could not get the ball inside to Boozer. To compensate, they tried posting Okur, Harpring, Andrei Kirilenko, and even Paul Millsap ─ but were unable to establish any of them as inside forces worthy of special defensive attention. The Spurs were likewise so quick-handed and quick-footed to the ball and into the passing lanes that the Jazz were looking over their shoulders whenever they did manage to find open shots. This distraction caused the visitors to miss at least a dozen layups. At the outset, Bruce Bowen did a terrific job in controlling Williams. And even though Kirilenko had considerable size advantages over both Finely and Ginobili, he was never a factor on offense. The real surprises were how easily Oberto (with only a minimum of help) was able to contain Boozer; and how Parker (with even less help) was able to shut down Derek Fisher. Fisher and Harpring scored on jumpers after curling off weak-side screens, but their successes were never repeated. The Jazz were able to stay in touch early because of their offensive rebounding, and also because of Okur's 3-point shooting. But when the Spurs made the appropriate adjustments, these opportunities just about disappeared. Williams was the only Jazz-er who was able to break down the Spurs' defense on a regular basis ─ mostly with headlong penetrations and crafty pull-up jumpers. However, it should be noted that the 18 points that Williams registered in the fourth quarter were mostly tallied against Parker. Apparently, once the game was virtually in the bag, Gregg Popovich decided to avoid having Williams get too used to being defended by Bowen. The subtle decision will undoubtedly pay dividends as the series progresses. C. Spurs' game plan The Spurs played with more verve all over the court. And in the closing minutes of the game, they did what they had to do in order to keep the desperate Jazz at arm's length. Indeed, despite Utah's courageous concluding run, San Antonio's grip on the game was never seriously threatened. From start to finish, the Spurs played with the confidence born of their championship experience. They knew which aspects of their versatile offense would work because they recognized the various soft spots in Utah's defense. At the same time, they knew exactly how and where to focus their defensive pressure. In other words, San Antonio's coaching staff did a much better job of preparing their team than did Jerry Sloan and his assistants. However, one win (as one-sided as it was) doesn't mean that the rest of the series will be a cake-walk for the Spurs. The Jazz gleaned some useful information from Game 1. # That if Williams can't guard Parker, the reverse is also true. # That Boozer can get more unimpeded shots from the high-post than he can in the pivot. # That their own weak-to-strong-side curls are also wide open. # That while Jarron Collins is useless trying to defend Duncan, Rafael Araujo was surprisingly effective. Game 2 will be interesting if only due to the adjustments that both teams will invariably make. But the human chess match has just begun. There's a long way to go from San Antonio's sensational opening gambit to the final check-mate. http://msn.foxsports.com/nba/story/6833268 --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 59.41.40.174