作者chenzhishun1 (chenzhishun1)
看板TOEIC
標題Re: [題目] 新多益必考單字600 P155 L25
時間Mon Feb 8 11:39:56 2010
※ 引述《aclgpo ( )》之銘言：
: : Here is a straightforward sentence:
: : "The accountant NEED TO base his plan on realistic numbers."
: : One may rewrite it as:
: : "The accountant NEED realistic numbers TO base his plan on ."
: : But to end a sentence with a preposition is sometimes considered substandard,
: : so we follow what iwwe has suggested and put that "on" in front of "which."
: 感謝c大 i大以及其他板友的指點~ 不過我還是有點不懂
: 1. 以c大的講解 是不是也就文法上 因為on放在前面 所以加個which當介系詞的受詞
: 而which就是realistic numbers?
: 註:如果是這樣 這種文法是叫做?
: 2. 還是說 which是引導形容詞子句 修飾realistic numbers?
: 這樣的話to base是助動詞變化來的
: 如 which the accountant can base his plan on (再把on放在前面)
: 註: 我以為這個助動詞變化成不定詞的用法只適用於名詞子句
: 如 I don't know what I should do.
: ( I don't know what to do. )
: : → iwwe :on which to base his plan是老外比較常用的文法 02/07 06:36
: : → iwwe :same goes to "to which", "for which", "by which" 02/07 06:36
Dear aclgpo,
Some questions can be expained in a fews words or lines of sentences, this
question, I afraid, is not one of these.
The question you raised is about "relative clauses" or "dependent clauses."
Not a easy topic I would say, but it is important to understand it well.
Here is a nice page from BBC World Service:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/grammar/learnit/
learnitv286.shtml
also
http://www.edufind.com/english/grammar/REL3.CFM
hope that helps ^^
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 202.169.165.62
1F：推 aclgpo :嗯嗯 我了解了 謝謝c大 02/08 14:12
2F：→ iwwe :explained* :) 02/08 16:14
3F：推 ashurali :在BBC那個網頁裡中間淺色底的最後一句話，第一個that 02/08 18:20
4F：→ ashurali :是做什麼用呢？ 02/08 18:21
5F：→ chenzhishun1:(Please)Sit down.(祈使句, subject you and is 02/08 23:39
6F：→ chenzhishun1:often omitted. 02/08 23:40
7F：→ chenzhishun1:(Please) Note that …. It is a that clause, also 02/08 23:41
8F：→ chenzhishun1:called "a content clause." ^^ 02/08 23:42
9F：→ ashurali :Note from three sentences beginning with NOTE in 02/09 08:44
10F：→ ashurali :that area, only the last one got a comma before 02/09 08:45
11F：→ ashurali :THAT. This is the actual point that bewilders me. 02/09 08:46
12F：→ ashurali :Just regarding it as the THAT CLAUSE after NOTE 02/09 08:48
13F：→ ashurali :is OK (not caring about the comma). 02/09 08:49
14F：→ ashurali :I suddenly found that I also used a comma in my 02/09 08:52
15F：→ ashurali :first sentence here :p 02/09 08:53
16F：→ chenzhishun1:i agree with you ^^ 02/09 10:41
17F：→ chenzhishun1:Note that... ==> Note ,$#^%$^,that... for example 02/09 12:04
18F：→ chenzhishun1:Note,for the record,the violators will be 02/09 12:07
19F：→ chenzhishun1:physically punished. 02/09 12:08
20F：→ chenzhishun1:Note that ==> Note @$%@%@$, that... for example 02/09 12:09
21F：→ chenzhishun1:Note at the end of this letter, Mr. Jones has 02/09 12:15
22F：→ chenzhishun1:signed and agreed to the specific terms and 02/09 12:17
23F：→ chenzhishun1:conditions. 02/09 12:17
24F：→ chenzhishun1:i personally think using 2 commas is clearer than 02/09 12:19
25F：→ chenzhishun1:using only ^^ 02/09 12:19
26F：→ chenzhishun1:one. Forgot to put a 'that' in the 2nd example :p 02/09 12:22
27F：→ chenzhishun1:And the first one too :p What's going on with me? 02/09 12:25
28F：推 ashurali :You mentioned a very important concept that 02/09 12:54
29F：→ ashurali :punctuations were used for letting the meaning 02/09 12:56
30F：→ ashurali :clearer. Sometimes people just focus too much 02/09 12:56
31F：→ ashurali :on the grammar. 02/09 12:57
32F：推 ashurali :punctuations "were" used --> are 02/09 13:02
33F：→ chenzhishun1:i couldn't agree with you more ^^ 02/09 13:08