Least Valuable MVP Why the Mavericks are better without Steve Nash. By Matthew Yglesias Updated Wednesday, June 7, 2006, at 5:12 PM ET In the summer of 2004, Steve Nash signed a widely ridiculed five-year, $65 million contract with the Phoenix Suns. His former team, the Dallas Mavericks, would have liked to re-sign him but couldn't see making a long-term, expensive commitment to a 30-year-old point guard with back problems and a reputation for playing terrible defense. Nash在2004年跟太陽簽下的6500萬5年的長約.，老東家小牛原本有意與他續約~ ~但對於一個已經30歲有背傷且防守很糟的後衛來說.大家都認為太陽簽了一份可笑 的合約 Two years later, nobody's mocking the Suns. Nash and Phoenix coach Mike D'Antoni have built an unorthodox and highly effective offense centered on the fast break and the 3-point shot. The Suns had the league's best regular-season record in 2005. This year, despite the loss of Amare Stoudemire ,they made it all the way to the Western Conference finals. Along the way, Nash has won consecutive MVP awards; he's the only point guard besides Magic Johnson to win two. 在兩年之後NASH和DANTONI已將在季賽的表現中證明這並不可笑,快攻及外線得分點. 她們在2005拿到聯盟戰績最佳的成績.這個球季在阿罵缺陣的狀況下仍然打進西區 冠軍賽.NASH也贏得了第二個個人MVP.他是繼魔術強森之後第一位做到的後衛 So, do the Mavericks regret their decision to let one of the game' s top players go? Not at all. The Mavericks, who knocked out the Suns last week on their way to the NBA Finals, are doing just fine without Nash. In fact, the two-time MVP was the one holding them back 以上的結果是否讓小牛感覺到後悔?結論是一點也不. 小牛仍然在分區冠軍賽打敗了太陽.她們在沒有NASH的情況下表現的很不錯,事實上 .NASH才是小牛的阻力。 http://www.slate.com/id/2143226/ 以上這篇是比較負面新聞..我個人感覺這個REPORTER有點偏激 希望明年可以證明給他看NASH是助攻王~~是真正的bvp...most valuable那種 太陽今年的處境應該跟當年的小牛一樣吧 缺乏真正的禁區球員!!! 明年要CHAMPION給他看! --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 218.166.154.84