如果是跟統計軟體有關請重發文章 如果跟論文有關也煩請您重發文章 文章類別是為了幫助大家搜尋資料與解答，造成不便之處請見諒 請知道答案的人告訴我這題要怎麼解 謝謝!! In a study conducted for the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, data was collected to produce a 50-state model for determining revenue needs for long term care for elderly coal miners with Black Lung disease. The model which provided the best prediction for actual dollars spent on long term care for Black Lung was based on the number of miners over 65, the total coal production in the state, and the per capita income, all of which were hypothesized to contribute positively to black Lung health care expenditures. The state expenditures are measured as expenditures in millions of 1998 dollars. (Hints: there are more than six problems, but you only need to identify six.) Table 1. Regression Analysis on Health Care for Elderly Miners Intercept % of Pop. Per capita Total Coal Over 60 Income Production (1000$) (million tons) 16 19.5 -171.2 -1.9 (2.3) (0.02) (2.7) Adjusted r2 = 1.02 F=4.6 P(F) = -.00513 The analyst decided that there was no way that any Black lung expenditures could be less than $1.6 million per year, and that the coefficient for Per Capita income proved that rich states were stingy. The probability of these results being correct was 1.02. From the estimated coefficients, increasing per capita income will have a greater impact on black lung expenditures than total coal production. Lastly, the best way to hold down black lung expenditures was to stop mining coal. --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 67.191.83.132