作者bmka (偶素米蟲)
站內Statistics
標題[討論] (Mis)reporting in psychology journals
時間Wed Oct 12 12:11:52 2011
蠻有趣的一篇文章
http://andrewgelman.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/BakkerWicherts2011.pdf
"on the basis of 281 articles.... around 18% of
statistical results in the psychological literature
are incorrectly reported. Inconsistencies were
more common in low-impact journals than in high-impact journals.
Moreover, around 15% of the articles contained at
least one statistical conclusion that proved,
upon recalculation, to be incorrect; that is,
recalculation rendered the previously significant
result insignificant, or vice versa. These errors
were often in line with researchers’ expectations."
文中有列舉常見的錯誤,
大家不妨參考看看自己是不是也犯了同樣的毛病
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 173.73.125.207
1F：推 imaltar:所以impact factor越高越難投自有他的道理xd 10/12 12:15
2F：→ gsuper:是在說黃金三重覆+無腦t檢定嗎 10/12 15:09
3F：→ bmka:g大有空讀一下paper吧 10/12 20:43
4F：→ clickhere:如果這篇沒犯同樣毛病的話, 那高IF的也沒好到哪... 10/13 09:01
5F：→ clickhere:為啥統計的IF都沒這高呀!! 10/13 09:02
6F：推 evilove:推一下這篇 10/13 09:45
7F：→ evilove:if跟同學門比才有意義 10/13 09:46
8F：→ bmka:IF在統計界不那麼重要吧, 四大期刊的IF都低得可憐 XD 10/13 11:08
9F：→ bmka:像Biostatistics這種新期刊IF竟然比四大期刊高 (笑) 10/13 11:10
10F：推 wi1son:IF本來就是一種學術界的商業行為 不一定代表什麼吧 10/13 18:05