作者kurtfu (kurt)
看板STS
標題[轉錄]Moore新片"Sicko"的報導
時間Wed May 30 22:22:23 2007
Cannes Journal
Aw, Shucks! Provocateur Takes On Health Care
By MANOHLA DARGIS and A. O. SCOTT
Published: May 21, 2007
Correction Appended
CANNES, France, May 20
Three years after conquering the Cannes Film Festival and winning the Palme
d’Or for “Fahrenheit 9/11,” Michael Moore has returned the amour big time
with “Sicko,” his most fluid provocation to date. A persuasive,
insistently leftist indictment of the American health care system, as well
as a funny valentine to all things French — and many things Canadian,
British and Cuban — the film shows that while Mr. Moore remains a radical
partisan, he has learned how to sell his argument with a softer touch.
He’s still the P. T. Barnum of activist cinema, but he no longer runs the
entire circus directly from the spotlight.
To that shrewd end almost an entire hour has lapsed before Mr. Moore
lumbers in front of the camera in “Sicko,” his aw-shucks grin and baseball
cap firmly in place. By that point he has introduced a wealth of evidence
(photographs, news clips and archival footage) and a sprawling cast of
characters (patients, health care workers and Washington politicians), each
another piece in the evolving puzzle. How did we get here and why?,
Mr. Moore asks in his faux-folksy, at times icky-sticky voice-over. Though
of course there’s never any doubt that this director of “Bowling for
Columbine,” a blistering attack on American gun culture, believes he knows
who is to blame for the state of the nation’s health care and why.
Mr. Moore has always been a canny rhetorician: He’s a master of the obvious
observation and the pseudo-naive question. These can be effective ploys,
but they sometimes come across as maddeningly condescending. Early in “Sicko”
he says, “I always thought that the health insurance companies were here to
help us,” a statement that the very existence of this film proves
preposterous. It’s as if Mr. Moore’s didn’t want his Everyman persona to
look or sound too smart, a tactic that results only in dumber movies. He’s
on firmer ground when he lets other people do the talking and when he takes
his entertaining show on the road to Canada, Britain and France, where in
between nicely timed comic bits and man-on-the-street encounters, he
explores the many pluses if none of the minuses of universal health care.
By contrast his widely publicized trip to Cuba with Americans in need of
better health care, including a handful of Sept. 11 rescue workers,
registers as ill conceived because it takes place in a political vacuum.
It’s difficult to share his enthusiasm about that country’s apparently
terrific health care given its history of human-rights abuses. Mr. Moore’s
larger point is that there is something terribly wrong when one of the
world’s poorer nations can care for its people while the richest, most
powerful nation in the world lets its citizens literally rot on the street,
as happens every day on Los Angeles’s skid row. In “Sicko” greed is the
pathogen that has diseased a health care system in which all Americans,
including those who think that the H.M.O. card in their wallet has them
covered, are the terminally wronged patients. MANOHLA DARGIS
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/21/movies/21cann.html?ex=1180670400&en=b0ea5d39c47ea2d2&ei=5070
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.230.188.164