作者knoxvillt (胖胖)
看板Rays
標題[農場] Draft Summary Post
時間Sun Jun 12 21:40:19 2011
So, the draft is over and the Rays have selected these
60 players. They have
selected
20 HS players (
9 of them in the first 5 rounds),
35 COL players and
5 JC players.
The Rays have selected
29 pitchers (
6 LHP,
23 RHP; only 3 prep arms in the
first 34 rounds!) and
31 position players (listed at:
7 C,
4 1B,
2 2B,
5 SS,
4 3B,
8 OF).
They started to select
lots of position players early on with
10 of their
first 15 picks (
rounds 1-5) being hitters.
這部份有2個重點：
1. 前5輪選9位高中生(將近一半，今年選20位。)，今年選秀以大學生為主。
註：JC = Junior College，2年制專科學院。
2. 選秀策略以野手為主，前15Pick(1~5輪)有10位野手，從此可知FO想要補強農場新秀
最缺乏的野手。
Overall impressions:
And while I am okay with the selection of a bit more hitters than pitchers,
they should have grabbed more prep pitching talent. I mean,
this was/is the
MAIN STRENGTH of this draft class and IT IS THE MAIN STRENGTH of the Rays
player development. And while the AL East fues selected guys like Cody Kukuk
(Red Sox), Joe Musgrove, Daniel Norris and Kevin Comer (Blue Jays) after the
1st round, the Rays "only" selected Blake Snell.
作者認為野手多於投手這個策略是可以的，但他覺得應該要選更多投手才對。意思是說
投手才是本次選秀賣點所在且符合球隊農場發展特性。其指出像是其他美東隊伍為了保險
起見在第1輪皆選下順位高的投手新秀而球團"僅"選擇 Blake Snell。
註：個人猜想作者意思是 Taylor Guerrieri 問題太多且有可能唸大學，明明第1輪還有
其他潛力投手可選卻選擇野手。("選擇 Blake Snell" 應是作者酸FO放棄第1輪優勢
[3 PICK]棄投選野)
I hope the Rays are not outsmarting themselves like the Mariners did on
the major league level 1,5 years ago (overvaluing defense).
Everybody needs
a power bat and not all players have to be up-the-middle talent.
The biggest
weakness in the Rays farm system is hitting power and while some players
project for good power (Mikie Mahtook, Tyler Goeddel, Johnny Eierman,
Granden Goetzman, J.D. Davis and maybe Kes Carter) there is no middle-of-the-
order bat selected.
作者希望球團不要像1年半前的水手一樣選過頭(太重視守備)，不是所有球員都具有中上
資質但都需要長打能力，球隊農場系統最大弱點在於長打能力。雖然有些球員具有不錯
長打實力但整體打擊潛力排不上中段。
Overall I'm a bit disappointed as some big names are missing and as
the Rays
(when looking at the scouting reports)
didn't find some really high upside
hidden gems. The potential of this crop is very, very huge, nevertheless. So,
I trust the process (for now).
整體來說作者對於本次沒能選到名列在球探報告高知名度與不知名但具有高潛力的新秀
有點失望，但他還是相信選秀的結果是對的。
Breaking down the draft days,
I'm more okay with day 2 than with day 1.
Grandon Goetzman and
Johnny Eierman are the talents 3 and 4 on my board
(
slightly ahead of Tyler Goeddel).
They also selected some SS and power prep
talents as well as solid college pitchers (
especially for the bullpen) on
day 2.
Day 1 started out very well but was a disappointment overall.
No top
college pitcher (Osich, Meo, ...),
no top prep pitcher next to
Guerrieri
(Owens, Boyd, Kelly, Lopez, Fulmer, ...) and
no potential middle-of-the-order
bat (Vogelbach, Harrison) has been selected.
這段比較長，簡單說重點有3：
1. 作者認為第2天選的比第1天好。
2. Grandon Goetzman 和 Johnny Eierman 是作者心目中的第3和第4，高過於球團所選的
Tyler Goeddel。此外，所選的大學投手(具有實力)如能養起來對牛棚也有幫助。
3. 第1天選的還可以但整體來說令人失望，原因有3：沒有頂尖大學投手、不繼續選擇像
Guerrieri 這樣資質的投手和沒選下具有中段打擊資質的野手。
原文蠻長的，拆成2部份翻譯，有錯請指正。
原文：
http://tinyurl.com/3d9a3m2
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.231.53.227
※ 編輯: knoxvillt 來自: 61.231.53.227 (06/12 21:45)
1F：推 srysry :k版主 其實原文有錯C是8位 我自己重算過 06/12 22:38
2F：→ srysry :因為跟我算不同 本想在那推文 有點懶就算了@@" 06/12 22:40
3F：→ knoxvillt :我沒去算有幾位0.0 直接就翻了 06/12 22:45
4F：→ knoxvillt :不知道是否有人想翻這次新秀的球探報告 前面已經有 06/12 22:46
5F：推 csy1911 :對光芒來說 高知名度&高資質 要花太多錢囉 06/12 22:46
6F：→ knoxvillt :幾篇 剩下的還蠻多可以翻的 我自己預定會翻第1輪 06/12 22:46
7F：→ knoxvillt :包括3明治選秀 不過若是只有我翻 要翻完可能... 嗯 06/12 22:47
8F：→ knoxvillt :大概要明星賽之後 畢竟要做的事情太多 不可能花太多 06/12 22:48
9F：→ knoxvillt :時間在這 在此徵求熱心鄉民幫忙翻譯 獎勵... 再想想 06/12 22:48
10F：→ knoxvillt :說不定鄉民都比我有錢QQ 06/12 22:49
11F：→ srysry :那不怪版主啦 只是我以為老外會注意到@@" 06/12 22:50
12F：→ srysry :不過這真的也在想就是 之前想說翻了沒簽到 06/12 22:51
13F：→ srysry :不然給K版主一個建議 我以前在馬刺看板時 06/12 22:53
14F：→ srysry :他們將外電稿整理在下面 讓板友去認領翻譯 06/12 22:53
15F：→ srysry :這樣或許集眾多板友之力 也許能比較快完成 06/12 22:54
16F：→ srysry :只是這樣要犧牲一篇公告 這是我想到的 06/12 22:54
17F：推 csy1911 :推s大想法 本身是刺迷 也是光芒迷 這個方法可以避免 06/12 22:55
18F：→ srysry :也不一定用公告 也可以用整理文章 集體比較可行 06/12 22:55
19F：→ csy1911 :重複翻 06/12 22:55