值得一題的是Callis在chat裡面回答的一個問題~ Q: Jayson from South Carolina asks: So where would Justin Smoak have been ranked if he were eligible for the top 20? A: Jim Callis: One scout who got a glimpse of Smoak when he joined Clinton at the end of the season told me he thought Smoak was the best prospect in the league. I probably would have ranked him No. 2. Smoak非常的被看好~^^ 另外關於我們2007第一輪的兩位投手沒能上榜，Callis解釋如下~ Q: Matt from Ft Worth asks: Where is Michael Main? He wasn't in the NW League top 20 and not in the Midwest top 20? What gives? A: Jim Callis: He didn't pitch enough innings to qualify for either league. Like many high school pitchers in their first full season, Main saw his stuff dip a little bit. His fastball sat around 91 mph and his curveball was average, though his changeup was better than anticipated. He's still a quality prospect. Q: Zack from Plano, TX asks: Blake Beavan? Why no top 20 love for him? A: Jim Callis: I went back and forth on who should get the last spot on the Top 20, and Beavan was one of the guys under consideration. (I'll throw out my standard MWL disclaimer, here, too: The league is one of the largest in the minors with 14 clubs, making it harder to crack this Top 20.) Beavan's fastball and curveball weren't nearly as electric as they were in high school. He did a nice job of pitching with his sinker and he's still a good prospect. But the guys I talked to who saw him liked him and didn't love him, and I decided to go with Trevor Reckling at No. 20. 基本上兩個人的評價都有下滑的跡象，尤其是Beavan，在改姿勢後還有一段路要走~ -- 歡迎到小斌的無名參觀 http://www.wretch.cc/blog/teixeira 有任何疑問，都歡迎你問小斌喔^^ --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 203.204.132.187