http://wwwc.house.gov/international_relations/109/20403.PDF 這一份是我在眾議院搜尋所有台灣相關資料 與軍事最有關係的一份眾議院報告 有興趣的人可以看看所謂報告的形式 以及裡面內容 看完整篇 終於找到一段裡面有提到no charge Mr. LEACH. The Subcommittee will come to order and on behalf of the Subcommittee, I would like to welcome our distinguished witnesses to the hearing today. I particularly want to thank Deputy Assistant Secretary Schriver and our panel of private experts for accommodating the change in time for proceedings this morning. By way of explanation, we are obligated to begin a bit early because Victor Yushchenko, the newly-elected President of the Ukraine, will be speaking in a few hours before a joint session of Congress. In addition, I am obligated to attend a memorial service this morning for George F. Kennon, a mentor and, indeed hero, of mine. I can think of no greater public service role model. The subject matter of our hearing this morning, relations across the Taiwan Strait and their implications for United States policy, involves a set of enormously complex and intertwined problems, the management of which is central to the preservation of peace and stability in Asia and the Pacific. Here, it is critical to review the history both of the breakthrough in United States-China relations that occurred during the Nixon Administration and the philosophical aspects of American history which relate to issues of a nature similar to mainland Taiwan divisions today. United States’ recognition of China was formally ensconced in a carefully negotiated communique and two subsequent understandings. The United States accepted a one-China framework for our relations with the most populous country in the world. At the same time, the three Executive Branch initiatives were complimented by the Taiwan Relations Act, which establishes a commitment of the United States that no change in the status of Taiwan be coercively accomplished through the use of force. While anti-Communist, the party of Chaing Kai-shek in Taiwan had certain organizational attributes similar to the Communist 2 party on the mainland. And in one circumstance of philosophical consistency, both the Kuomintang of Chiang Kai-shek and the Communist party of Mao Zedons claimed to be the governing party of all of China, including Taiwan. Hence, the Nixon one-China approach did not contradict the Nationalist positions of the old Kuomintang or the old and new Communist party on the mainland. 不過這一段 說的只是當時歷史經過 講述當時美國接受一個中國政策 但同時訂立了台灣關係法 並且沒有索費地提供武力給 反共但高壓統治如共產黨於大陸的蔣介石的在台灣的政黨 台灣關係法和當時沒有索費是完全兩件事 沒有索費並不是因為台灣關係法 所以這一份應該也不是李立委所提的報告 但是卻是用字最接近的報告了 --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 66.177.38.128