最近有讀到有關他的書 有一些疑問 實在很想知道答案 所以跟各位請教一下: 請問關於他所說的言說(Speech)是什麼意思呢 還有它主張到底人和動物在表徵事物最大不同點在哪 麻煩各位大大解惑 --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 116.59.238.68 Many living thing other than human exist in association with others of their own kind and profoundly affected by this.Mead argued,however,that the basis for human interaction differs substantially from other animals,including our primate cousins.Each individual,in beginning an act,engages in overt and visible action that can be detected by others and serve as stimuli to their response.Its physical gestures are stimuli that key an aggresive response from the other.Interaction thus proceeds between the animals,with the control of each dog's behavior effectively in the hands of the other. In no sense does either "decide" or "make up its mind" to act in a certain way.In no sense does either "decide" or "make up its mind" to act in a certain way.It is quite otherwise for humans,as Mead so incisively saw and explained. Humans are animals who possess language and whose conduct occurs in a world of word.We are attuned not just to the overt bodily movements of others,but also to a complex set of vocalization that precede and accompany their acts and our own. Second,these vocal gestures act of speech have the unique property of arousing in the one using them nearly the same response as they arouse in the others to whom they are directed. 大概是這篇文章 說實在有些段落還是看不懂 所以想貼上來問問大家 ※ 編輯: a33278596 來自: 116.59.230.36 (09/29 13:31)