http://www.nbadraft.net/2010-nba-draft-grades Draft Grade: B+ Additions: Picks: No. 10 Paul George, No. 40 Lance Stephenson No. 51 Magnum Rolle Analysis: Larry Bird took a risk! And then he took another and another! The Pacers are known for drafting proven college players such as Brandon Rush, Tyler Hansbrough and Roy Hibbert. George was a departure from that ideology, one that has left the team mired in mediocrity. He's got great upside and looks a lot like Rudy Gay, but there's understandable concern that he is turnover prone, makes poor decisions and played low level competition at Fresno State. Stephenson could be very good, and at No. 40, his massive risk factor – egotism being the primary concern – is acceptable. Rolle played in the WAC with George but is the type of athlete the Pacers' frontcourt needs. The big question here is, how will George and Danny Granger play together? They share many of the same traits. Still, good – and refreshing – picks from Indiana. 簡譯： 大鳥想賭一把，呃！應該不只一把，他這個也想賭那個也想賭！XD 眾所周知，溜馬過去兩年選秀選了幾個實力不錯但天賦有限的球員， 像是拉許、漢堡和希伯特，然而，喬治則和這些人有明顯的不同， 他是一個能讓球隊脫胎換骨的男人。他一定會爆發，可能會像蓋伊 那麼好，但他的缺點也是顯而易見的，像是失誤太多、有時會無腦 、在 Fresno State 那樣較低水平的競爭環境下會過於散漫等。 40順位能選到 Stephenson 很不錯，只是他也是一個很有風險的球 員，他的問題是在場外因素還有球風過於自私，但後者應該是可以 解決的。 51順位的 Rolle是個活蹦亂跳的長人，他的機動力是溜馬禁區很需 要的元素。 以上，此刻最大的問題是，你要如何將喬治和妙麗同時派上場？他 們倆簡直就像複製人般，都很棒，很讓人驚嘆，現在溜馬有雙刀了。 --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 218.166.11.202