http://voices.washingtonpost.com/nationalsjournal/2010/01/a_few_afternoon_notes.html?wprss=nationalsjournal Washington Post 2010.01.27 * I'm not sure if the Nats have given free agent second baseman Orlando Hudson their take-it-or-leave-it offer, but it seems to me, in talking to a few guys in the front office, that the team is simply waiting on his decision. If Hudson signs elsewhere, the team's Plan B options at 2B/SS are decidedly underwhelming. The Nats want to go to Florida with more than Ian Desmond, Cristian Guzman, Alberto Gonzalez and Eric Bruntlett among their middle infielders, and they might explore a trade. The latest from Ken Rosenthal suggests that as many as six teams are vying for Hudson. 國民在等待O-Dog的回應，紅人和Orlando Cabrera似乎有機會簽約，這樣競爭就會變 成五隊 * There's still some advocacy from some in front office for the Nats to sign John Smoltz. I don't get the sense that talks between Washington and Smoltz have heated up yet, though. But in the last weeks of the offseason, as Washington looks to sign a final starter, Smoltz could be the frontrunner if he's interested. 看來雖然Doug Davis認為國民要補強內野沒有錢簽他，如果Smoltz有意願國民應該還是 會花錢並完成先發輪值的補強 [整理] Davis 和 Smoltz的差別 2009 Red Sox/Cards John Smoltz (3-8, 6.35),15 Starts, 78IP, 73K, 18BB,11HR D-Backs Doug Davis (9-14,4.12),34 Starts,203IP,146K,103BB,25HR 另外 2009 K/9 BB/9 Davis 6.46 4.56 (生涯 6.67 4.06) Smoltz 8.42 2.08 (生涯 7.99 2.62) 從能力而言，雖然已經年屆40，Smoltz還是比Davis好很多(就連09年的球速都比他快...) 但上一次Smoltz投出200IP已經是2007年，要指望2010年健康的他並不容易，120IP是合理 的預估，不過Smoltz可以投出還不錯的120局(去年的6.35ERA是因為高達0.364的BABIP造成 ，他生涯BABIP是0.284，加上回到NL，回歸正常是可以的)，至於Davis至少可以投出160- 200局，但是是非常穩定的Bad innings。不知道各位板友認為國民隊現在需要什麼呢？ 身為球迷我會比較期待看到Smoltz, 如果是差不多的價格。 --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 123.193.66.207 ※ 編輯: carlls 來自: 123.193.66.207 (01/30 07:00)