作者goodjs (Hung)
看板NY-Yankees
標題[Wang] Wang deserves a better review
時間Thu Dec 13 07:25:35 2007
http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2007/12/12/wang-deserves-a-better-review/
It’s interesting how 5.2 innings against Cleveland in October turned
Chien-Ming Wang into a bum in the eyes of some.
Andy Pettitte went to bat for the Wanger today. But many comments and e-mail
disagreed. One guy wrote to tell me that “Wang had a terrible second half.”
Well, he was 10-3, 4.07 after the break, 3-1, 3.27 in September.
Another e-mailer (presumably somebody taking a break from their afternoon
six-pack in Boston), wrote to say how Beckett “is twice as good as Wang.”
Beckett was 20-7, 3.27; Wang was 19-7, 3.70. That’s twice as good?
Is Beckett better than Wang? He was in 2007. He wasn’t in 2006. Wang will be
entering only his third full season in the majors in 2008 and for the first
time will be using more than two pitches on a regular basis. Can we wait a
bit before deciding what he is or isn’t?
Wang, I think, is a victim of himself. He’s quiet, unemotional and rarely
does televised interviews because he speaks English as a second language. He
also isn’t a strikeout pitcher.
If Wang threw more four-seam fastballs, struck out a few more scrubs and
pumped his fist once in a while, I suspect people would like him more. It’s
kind of silly.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 192.149.109.55
1F：推 krara:真high耶，"王的二倍強" 12/13 07:37
2F：→ krara:我論這篇被戰起來的可能性… 12/13 07:38
3F：推 dracla:洋基板應該還好吧@@~不過在MLB版應該有的玩 12/13 07:39
4F：→ goodjs:看下面的推文也是很不錯 很多人都give Wang credit 12/13 07:41
5F：推 agoodjob:2F講的中肯! 12/13 07:42
6F：推 largesperm:胖子也滿挺小王的 12/13 08:28
7F：推 dans:講的很中肯 拿貝基特和王比的確有所不公 12/13 10:10
8F：→ dans:但貝基特"目前"的成績比王還優秀也的確是事實 12/13 10:11
9F：推 eilgreen:也沒人說王比貝基特好阿 12/13 10:12
10F：推 goran5899:說王比貝基特好的人,可能眼睛不只到需要戴眼鏡的狀態 12/13 10:39
11F：推 Moxon:只能說"今年"Beckett比王好 去年可不是這樣 明年也不一定 12/13 11:02
12F：推 redsnipertd:今年的Beckett成功的把stuff轉換成實績,其實一直以來 12/13 11:06
13F：→ redsnipertd:他的K/BB比都很棒,只是一直被水泡問題困擾 12/13 11:06
14F：→ redsnipertd:如果能真正克服這個問題,明年成績不會"不一定"到哪去 12/13 11:06
15F：推 RollingWave:去年Beckett K/bb退化的很恐怖就是了... 12/13 11:08
16F：推 redsnipertd:去年他真的就是手指起水泡起了一整年 硬幹一整年 12/13 11:09
17F：→ redsnipertd:今年不就又回來了嗎?(煙) 12/13 11:10
18F：推 cardfat:beckett手指起水泡起了一整年這消息那來的?? 12/13 11:30
19F：推 cardfat:我看THT說北極今年mechanical改善許多 倒沒提blister耶 12/13 11:32
20F：推 redsnipertd:"今年"mechanical改善很多,"今年"沒有起水泡 12/13 11:33
21F：推 redsnipertd:我是不相信他去年手指沒事,球路品質幾乎都有下降 12/13 11:37
22F：推 cardfat:"今年"沒有起水泡?? 12/13 11:38
23F：→ redsnipertd:我是不知道有沒有耶,以往年年都會因為那個進出DL 12/13 11:39
24F：→ redsnipertd:今年沒什麼印象 12/13 11:40
25F：推 cardfat:就說了"手指起水泡起了一整年硬幹一年"那來的?? 12/13 11:44
26F：推 redsnipertd:我是聽說他在06年因為水泡的關係影響投球很大 12/13 11:45
27F：→ cardfat:THT對beckett06烙賽 關係blister隻字未提 12/13 11:45
28F：→ jackselina:red大真是stuff魔人~可是我雞排都吃完了 還是不懂你們꘠ 12/13 11:45
29F：→ redsnipertd:喔是喔,好吧,那算我消息錯誤 抱歉 12/13 11:47
30F：→ jackselina:到底在討論的是什麼??? 12/13 11:47
31F：→ redsnipertd:就是為什麼Beckett去年丟的很差 12/13 11:47
32F：推 redsnipertd:不過說真的我不太相信單純mechanical的差別會造成這麼 12/13 11:52
33F：推 jackselina:瞭解~~去年給人的"感覺"是因為水泡問題影響控球 12/13 11:52
34F：→ redsnipertd:巨大的影響 12/13 11:52
35F：→ jackselina:不過水泡到底是不是北極的老問題就不得而知了 12/13 11:52
36F：→ jackselina:如果是那表示今年手突然不會起水泡?還是怎樣就不清楚了 12/13 11:53
37F：推 okah:這篇也滿挺小王的啊 12/13 16:03
38F：推 MarkWebber:投手起水泡不是很正常?小王指甲還不是黑掉過 12/13 19:00