(Question for I - VI) 1. Explain the two contradictions internal to the homo/heterosexual definition (i.e. what are the minoritising and universalising views?) 2. How does Sedgwick rework on the Foucaultian thesis of knowledge/power/sexuality? 3. How is the theoretical framework of deconstructionism situated in the book? 4. In what sense is Epistemology of the Closet a feminist and antihomophobic book? 5. How is Sedgwick's usage of the phrase 'homosexual panic' different from the forensic use of it? Question for Axiom I: Why is Sedgwick not happy about the poststructuralist theory of difference and how does she challenge it? Question for Axiom II: How does Sedgwick map out the conceptual framework of sexuality, one that is distinct from the feminist framework of gender? And why is it important for her to do that? Question for Axiom III: How does cross-identification work for the gay theorising that Sedgwick proposes? Question for Axiom IV: How does Sedgwick reformulate the constructionism/essentialism debate through her rendition of the universalising/minoritising view? Question for Axiom V: How does Sedgwick problematise the Foucaultian historicisation of homosexuality? Question for Axiom VI: What is the relationship between the master canon and the minority canons? How does Sedgwick use Bloom's narrative to make her point? Question for Axiom VII: How does Sedgwick use the problematic of identification with/as to elaborate her own position (as a feminist writing about male homosexuality)? --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.113.194.150