一、概念解釋(per 5%) 1.社會事實 2.集體意識良心 3.恢復法 4.自殺的社會類型 5.歷史哲學 6.精神現象學 7.主奴辯證 二、邏輯申論 1.1翻譯以下段落(5%) If money is the bond binding me to human life, binding society to me, connecting me with nature and man, is not money the bond of all bonds? Can it not dissolve and bind all ties? Is it not, therefore, also the universal agent of separation? It is the coin that really separates as well as the real binding agent – the chemical power of society. 1.2何謂商品拜物教?(4%)為甚麼政治經濟學家無法辨別這個層面?(4%) 1.3翻譯以下段落(5%) It is, however, just this ultimate money form of the world of commodities that actually conceals, instead of disclosing, the social character of private labour, and the social relations between the individual producers. When I state that coats or boots stand in a relation to linen, because it is the universal incarnation of abstract human labour, the absurdity of the statement is self-evident. Nevertheless, when the producers of coats and boots compare those articles with linen, or, what is the same thing, with gold or silver, as the universal equivalent, they express the relation between their own private labour and the collective labour of society in the same absurd form. 1.4請比較「資產社會中的貨幣」和「商品拜物教及其秘密」兩篇文章中對於貨幣的觀點 (7%) 2.請先解釋馬克思的資本邏輯?(10%)再解釋勞動價值和商品形式的關係。(15%) 3.馬克思先後提出異化勞動和意識型態的概念，請說明他對人性的看法及社會的構想的 變化。(25%) 4.馬克思從唯物辯證法中說世界會被革命推翻是為甚麼?(10%) 又是為甚麼最後沒有被推翻?(15%) 幹幹幹幹幹幹根本天書啊，我哭惹，這到底是甚麼樣的一場屠殺。 --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.119.120.6 ※ 文章網址: http://webptt.com/m.aspx?n=bbs/NCCU13_CHI/M.1416901398.A.AFE.html