※ 引述《zuilon2000 (越過地平面_衝鋒陷陣)》之銘言： : ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- : 光看名稱就吐槽一大半了，憑藉自主技術？還不是跟俄國佬買一堆關鍵技術？ : 光那上次運載火箭就知道了... http://tinyurl.com/7dgcycj 這邊有些照片 KM-SAM uses AESA MFR now. It doesn't have a need for separate target acquisition or illumination radars; that single radar does all the work: surveillance, target acquisition, and illumination (the missile is semi-active, so it still needs illuminator at the initial phase of intercept). The guidance system will be incrementally optimized to eventually bring the effective range (95~99% single-hit accuracy) of the missile to 120km, and twice that for maximum range, the required first step for K-THAAD, once we get the political clearance from certain someone. 八聯裝，主動導引，運動能力50G，相關的技術還有指向性彈頭跟側噴系統。 垂發，冷射出筒之後用前面的噴嘴做inital turn再點火。 (其實跟9M96一樣 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cwiski_xGaY ) TR模組是 Samsung跟Thales (XD)研發的。 或許射控從Thales來，彈體方面的技術從俄羅斯來。 這圖跟已經掛掉的某蛋好像，鄉民可以憑吊一下。 http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/6726/kmsammissile.jpg 或許將來也會上艦(謎) XD 圖的話網友這幾篇也有 http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/adf-jelly/article?mid=16055 http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/adf-jelly/article?mid=24869 --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 122.116.36.53 ※ 編輯: Erichartman 來自: 122.116.36.53 (12/16 16:11) ※ 編輯: Erichartman 來自: 122.116.36.53 (12/16 16:50) ※ 編輯: Erichartman 來自: 122.116.36.53 (12/16 19:28) ※ 編輯: Erichartman 來自: 122.116.36.53 (12/16 19:30)