Linguistics 板


LINE

Journal: Languages Issue: Recent Developments on the Semantics of Perception Verbs Call Deadline: 30-Nov-2025 Perception, the process by which a conscious entity captures, decodes, and interprets external stimuli, can rightly be considered one of the most sophisticated and fascinating processes of nature. As a cognitive process fundamental to all living beings, the phenomenon of perception has received considerable attention across various scientific fields, including linguistics . Indeed, since language is used primarily to talk about the world we perceive , language and perception are inextricably interwoven (Miller & Johnson-Laird 1976). This relation is reflected in the rich linguistic bibliography and the numerous studies dedicated to verbs of perception (cf. for instance Enghels 2007; Evans and Wilkins 2000; Ibarretxe-Antuñano 1999; Jansegers 2017; Norcliffe & Majid 2024; Sweetser 1990; Viberg 1984, 2001 among many others). Over the last few decades, perception verbs have garnered widespread interest as a key to understanding the relationship between language and cognition and how language mediates our human experience. Therefore, they can be studied from many angles, including – but not limited to – a typological, diachronic and syntactic perspective. First, verbs of perception have been studied typologically in relation to their polysemy and the (universal) patterns of lexicalization they give rise to. This had led to the idea that the lexicalization of perception verbs is constrained by a biologically grounded sense-modality hierarchy (Viberg 1984, 2001): sight > hearing > touch/taste/smell. According to this hierarchy, a verb having a basic meaning belonging to a sense modality higher in the hierarchy can get an extended meaning that covers some (or all) of the sense modalities lower in the hierarchy. Verbs higher in the hierarchy also give rise to metaphorical extensions. For example, it is well known that visual perception verbs have developed extended meanings beyond their denotational meaning linked to the domain of cognition (cf. ‘I see what you mean’) and similarly auditory perception has extended towards the notion of obedience (cf . ‘a child that does not listen’) (Evans and Wilkins 2000; Sweetser 1990). Likewise, it is well known that verbs of sight often give rise to a wide range of evidential values in various typologically non-evidential languages ( Albelda 2018). Also, senses higher in the hierarchy are supposed to be more frequent, diachronically stable and morphosyntactically complex. From a diachronic perspective, then, scholars also have focused on the lexicalization and grammaticalization process of perception verbs evolving towards discourse markers and serving a more pragmatic function. This process typically involves a gradual shift from concrete sensory meanings to more abstract, interactional and even discursive uses helping to organize and manage the flow of conversation (e.g. look in English, écoute in French, guarda in Italian, mira in Spanish). These patterns of grammaticalization have originated a rich bibliography on the cross-linguistic comparison of these grammaticalization patterns including both major national languages and under- studied indigenous languages (Van Olmen & Tantucci 2022; San Roque et al. 2018 ; Norcliffe & Majid 2024). Third, perception verbs and their meaning extensions are closely related to the choice of argument structure. Indeed, perception verbs can select both nominal or sentential complements and this selection interacts with their meaning (Dik & Hengeveld 1991). This syntax-semantics interface has been studied in large corpora, which allows not only qualitative descriptions of perception verbs, but also quantitative and statistical processing of the data (cf. among others Divjak 2015; Gries et al. 2020). The main purpose of this Special Issue consist of reporting on new and current interest and developments in research on the semantics of perception verbs, focusing on studies that innovate in terms of their topic, theoretical approach, and/or methodology. We welcome a wide range of (relevant) topics, which may include but are not limited to: - Cross-linguistic variation of perception verbs: studying both major national languages and under-studied (indigenous) languages, but also dialectical variants of the same language and sign language; - Cross-linguistic comparisons of grammaticalization trajectories of perception verbs: convergences and divergences; - A re-evaluation of the sense modality hierarchy through the analysis of lesser-studied languages (e.g. descriptions of tactile-dominant languages, alternative hierarchies in languages with different sensory salience); - New (diachronic) case studies of perception verbs evolving into discourse markers or modal particles. Perception verbs as markers of stance, evidentiality or (inter)subjectivity; emergence of discourse-level functions; - Lexicalization and grammaticalization of perception verbs as observed in different kinds of corpora, including spoken data; - New quantitative approaches to the syntax-semantics interface of perception verbs; - Corpus-based or experimental approaches to the analysis of the syntax and semantics of perception verbs. - Relevant papers regarding all languages from different frameworks are welcome. Timeline: Abstract Submission Deadline: September 10th Notification of Abstract Acceptance: September 30th Full Manuscript Deadline: November 30th We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 200 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send it to the guest editors (Marlies. [email protected]) or to /Languages/ editorial office ([email protected]). Abstracts will be reviewed by the guest editors for the purposes of ensuring proper fit within the scope of the special issue. Full manuscripts will undergo double-blind peer-review. More information and full list of references can be found on the on the journal's website: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/languages/special_issues/6RKEQ25KPG --



※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.255.128.80 (臺灣)
※ 文章網址: https://webptt.com/m.aspx?n=bbs/Linguistics/M.1752854383.A.601.html







like.gif 您可能會有興趣的文章
icon.png[問題/行為] 貓晚上進房間會不會有憋尿問題
icon.pngRe: [閒聊] 選了錯誤的女孩成為魔法少女 XDDDDDDDDDD
icon.png[正妹] 瑞典 一張
icon.png[心得] EMS高領長版毛衣.墨小樓MC1002
icon.png[分享] 丹龍隔熱紙GE55+33+22
icon.png[問題] 清洗洗衣機
icon.png[尋物] 窗台下的空間
icon.png[閒聊] 双極の女神1 木魔爵
icon.png[售車] 新竹 1997 march 1297cc 白色 四門
icon.png[討論] 能從照片感受到攝影者心情嗎
icon.png[狂賀] 賀賀賀賀 賀!島村卯月!總選舉NO.1
icon.png[難過] 羨慕白皮膚的女生
icon.png閱讀文章
icon.png[黑特]
icon.png[問題] SBK S1安裝於安全帽位置
icon.png[分享] 舊woo100絕版開箱!!
icon.pngRe: [無言] 關於小包衛生紙
icon.png[開箱] E5-2683V3 RX480Strix 快睿C1 簡單測試
icon.png[心得] 蒼の海賊龍 地獄 執行者16PT
icon.png[售車] 1999年Virage iO 1.8EXi
icon.png[心得] 挑戰33 LV10 獅子座pt solo
icon.png[閒聊] 手把手教你不被桶之新手主購教學
icon.png[分享] Civic Type R 量產版官方照無預警流出
icon.png[售車] Golf 4 2.0 銀色 自排
icon.png[出售] Graco提籃汽座(有底座)2000元誠可議
icon.png[問題] 請問補牙材質掉了還能再補嗎?(台中半年內
icon.png[問題] 44th 單曲 生寫竟然都給重複的啊啊!
icon.png[心得] 華南紅卡/icash 核卡
icon.png[問題] 拔牙矯正這樣正常嗎
icon.png[贈送] 老莫高業 初業 102年版
icon.png[情報] 三大行動支付 本季掀戰火
icon.png[寶寶] 博客來Amos水蠟筆5/1特價五折
icon.pngRe: [心得] 新鮮人一些面試分享
icon.png[心得] 蒼の海賊龍 地獄 麒麟25PT
icon.pngRe: [閒聊] (君の名は。雷慎入) 君名二創漫畫翻譯
icon.pngRe: [閒聊] OGN中場影片:失蹤人口局 (英文字幕)
icon.png[問題] 台灣大哥大4G訊號差
icon.png[出售] [全國]全新千尋侘草LED燈, 水草

請輸入看板名稱,例如:WOW站內搜尋

TOP