http://www.newsday.com/sports/basketball/knicks/ 有兩則有關trade ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 這一則是在講KVH和T.T http://www.newsday.com/sports/basketball/knicks/ ny-spkside183676292feb18,0,6618111.story?coll=ny-knicks-headlines 大意大概是東區某總裁提到"不少"T.T打球的缺點 該總裁且認為KVH是個相較之下比較好的球員,Bucks希望靠KVH撐起得分的責任 記者在當天記者會時T.T也承認自己的確沒有表現出他自己的潛力 也認為自己無法和KVH來"match" 相較之下也提出KVH走後在尼克方面有得分上的洞需要填補 而當記者問到T.T他能帶給尼克什麼的同時 他只能回答在我看來是很不知道該回答什麼的官樣標準答案 "It's not about scoring," Thomas said when asked about picking up the slack for Van Horn, who was averaging 16.4 points and 7.3 rebounds. "It's about winning basketball games. The bottom line here is to win basketball games and get the New York Knicks back to where everybody wants to be, and that's in the playoffs and having the caliber of team to win a championship." "First of all, I'm going to bring some more toughness and my athleticism to the court," he said. "Right now, my main concern is just jelling with the guys. We want to get back into a situation where we're back on top of the Atlantic. It's very possible for us if we jell right now." toughness and athleticism ?? 這個跟本不能算是答案的答案回答了那個無意義的問題嗎? athleticism 這個是 I.Thomas一直在交易前後強調的東西 toughness 這個完完全全是針對"soft"的KVH而來做的"我比KVH硬"的宣誓 看完他的回答我只希望他如果不能填上KVH的洞也至少認真抓板子和卡位 被人垢病的地方不比KVH少,如果數據上的表現還打不過KVH那就真的是需要下一波交易 這篇報導也有點像是在為KVH做最後的平反 But he called it a clear upgrade in talent for Milwaukee, saying, "Keith is a better player." He's No Van Horn KVH Thomas 47 Starts 42 33.5 Minutes 32.0 16.4 Points 14.1 7.3 Rebounds 4.9 12 Double-doubles 2 17 20-point games 10 6 25-point-plus games 1 -- --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.116.163.173