作者eliczone (C'est la vie)
看板Kings
標題[轉錄][外電] No penalty for Rondo's hard foul on …
時間Thu Apr 30 13:56:51 2009
※ [本文轉錄自 NBA 看板]
作者: gaga19900329 (GagaKnight) 看板: NBA
標題: [外電] No penalty for Rondo's hard foul on Miller
時間: Thu Apr 30 13:48:08 2009
來源：
http://tinyurl.com/csmjyl
No penalty for Rondo's hard foul on Miller
The NBA said Boston Celtics point guard Rajon Rondo won't be penalized for
his hard foul on Chicago's Brad Miller in the closing seconds of Game 5.
NBA當局宣布不會對Rondo在系列賽第五戰的犯規做出懲處。
NBA commissioner David Stern said Wednesday night in Atlanta before the
Hawks-Miami Heat game that no flagrant foul call on Rondo was the right call.
Stern說沒吹Rondo惡性犯規是個正確的判決。
"I was in Orlando, but I was reliably informed it was not a flagrant foul,"
Stern said. "Our referees do the best they can in these situations."
「那時我在奧蘭多，不過我確信這不是個惡性犯規」Stern說。「我們的裁判在當時的情
況下做得很好。」
As result of the NBA's position, there will be no fine or suspension for
Rondo or even flagrant foul points that could lead to a suspension if they
accumulate.
所以，Rondo不會因為這次犯規被罰款或禁賽，或是被記一次惡性犯規(有可能導致被禁賽)。
With the Bulls trailing by two in the final seconds of overtime on Tuesday
night, Miller had a clear path to the basket. But Rondo jumped and hit him
across the face and the lay-in attempt sailed wide.
當公牛在比賽中落後兩分時，Miller得到了一個上籃的空檔，不過Rondo跳了過來，並且出
手打中了他的臉，當然他的上籃也被毀掉了。
Though Rondo made contact with Miller above the shoulders, NBA executive vice
president of basketball operations Stu Jackson said the play fell short of
warranting a flagrant foul.
雖然Rondo與Miller在肩膀以上有肢體接觸，NBA籃球事務執行副總裁Stu Jackson說這個
犯規仍不足以構成一個惡性犯規。
"We felt Rondo was making a basketball play and going for the ball after a
blown defensive assignment by the Celtic team," Jackson said.
「我們覺得Rondo只是執行球隊的防守指令而已。」Jackson說。
"In terms of the criteria that we use to evaluate a flagrant foul penalty
one, generally we like to consider whether or not there was a windup, an
appropriate level of impact and a follow-through. And with this foul, we
didn't see a windup, nor did he follow through. So for that reason we're not
going to upgrade this foul to a flagrant foul penalty one."
「從我們用來判斷惡性犯規的標準來看，我們需要評估是否在還沒出手時就犯規了，，或
是在犯規後還有多餘的動作。而這個犯規顯然是兩者都沒有。所以我們並不會把這個犯規
視為惡性犯規。」
Miller missed the free throws that could have tied it, and the Celtics won
106-104 to take a 3-2 lead in the best-of-seven series
最後Miller錯失了可以追平比分的罰球，Celtics在7戰4勝制的系列賽中以106-104取得了
3-2領先的優勢。
----
NBA似乎總是不提出一個能在當下釐清爭議判決的方法？
----
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.43.157.193
1F：推 haue0425: 大米好可憐 = =... 04/30 13:49
2F：推 WizZ:NBA一直是一個以愛為主的聯盟 04/30 13:49
※ 編輯: gaga19900329 來自: 114.43.157.193 (04/30 13:50)
3F：推 Smush:Stern說了算= = 04/30 13:50
4F：推 jacktedrule:不知道下場公牛會怎麼打~~~會意外強硬? 一洩千里? 04/30 13:51
5F：推 permoon:戰這麼多白戰了，史騰大魔王一句話堵死= = 04/30 13:51
6F：推 kill90677:Stern說算了= = 04/30 13:51
7F：推 richard1003:公牛球員自己小心了,下一場大概要爆頭才會吹 04/30 13:52
8F：推 namon:希望公牛勝出... 一整個覺得stern想安排東區冠軍賽組合 04/30 13:52
9F：推 larson:Stern:我買了一千億外圍賭超賽幹掉LBJ,怎麼能有閃失呢? 04/30 13:52
10F：推 Creuset:所以hard foul事實上可以對人不對球? 04/30 13:53
11F：→ Duncan7406:不是LBJ幹掉超賽嗎??(誤~) 04/30 13:53
12F：推 iam55vivian:明天狗蛋又要Jordan化了 04/30 13:53
13F：推 christieswei:要大米爆氣打爆超賽應該不可能... 04/30 13:55
14F：推 aagun:Stern:我說的算!! 心裡os:還好我不用上場打球 04/30 13:55
15F：推 eliczone:借轉大米好可憐之前東家版 謝謝 04/30 13:56
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.130.141.241
16F：推 christieswei:明天大米30-30-10 04/30 14:06
17F：推 jingchou:這球直接尻臉竟然什麼處罰都沒有..大米哭哭 04/30 17:09
18F：推 pttsac:今年判的都很鬆吧 Ariza跟Bynum都沒禁的話只能說不意外囧 04/30 17:26
19F：推 GodEyes:David 強雄 04/30 20:02