今天的比賽打得蠻精彩的 值得我們給國王掌聲 分享幾點國外網友看到的點 大家可討論 Kenny Natt, for all intents and purposes, ensured the Kings will have a new head coach next season. I'll credit two decisions, both pertaining to (you guessed it) Thompson. Through three quarters, Thompson was a +30 in the ledger, with 19 points (on 12 FGAs), five rebounds, two assists, a block and zero turnovers. He played rather good (active, certainly) defense and very sleek offense. He had been, to that point, Sacramento's best player. He didn't get back into the game until there were 24 seconds left. A 14-point lead at the quarter break turned into a tied game during that span. To open the second half, the Kings ran a beautiful (beautiful!) Princeton set. I'm not a fortune teller, but I'm rather certain that's a Pete Carril play. Not a Kenny Natt: Disciple of Sloan play. The play ended (after about 20 perfect passes) with a Thompson-to-Nocioni lay-up. Jason Thompson ran the high post beautifully, and the team ran the Princeton beautifully. That play was basically the only endorsement for Eddie Jordan that you should need. But the key here is that Joe and Gavin Maloof saw all of this. They might be inarticulate on the radio and TV, but they aren't stupid. They saw the egregious mistake and the beautiful possibilities. The Kings will have a new coach this summer. JT是一個目前還不清楚未來發展的長人 不像Hawes的型就很明確 JT有現今少見願意打籃下 衝搶籃板的意願 但是他的活動力又不差 打普林斯頓時站高位的表現也很好 所以要把他 養成何種類型的長人就顯得選擇性變多了 而且這又牽涉Natt教練和老卡系統的問題 第四節幾乎不見JT的身影 這是一個很奇怪的事 Natt改讓Greene打PF 但效果不是說很好 也許教練還沒找到使用JT的方法 他願意衝搶籃板 但是目前進攻手段還很嫩 就站高位run 普林斯頓這點 或許他還能更證明自己 -- --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 123.192.9.95