※ [本文轉錄自 Celtics 看板] 作者: bri (.....................) 看板: Celtics 標題: [外電] Kevin Garnett Clutches up For the Win 時間: Wed May 7 23:49:39 2008 http://tinyurl.com/59yl48 Kevin Garnett Clutches up For the Win Talk about a difficult game to watch tonight between the Celtics and the Cavs. Both teams just were not able to get into any kind of rhythm and neither team was able to get any transition offense going. 談一點今晚 Celtics和騎士隊難看的比賽。兩隊就是不能進入任何型態的節奏，而且沒 有一隊可以打出一點快速攻防轉換。 Ultimately, the game came down to Kevin Garnett of the Celtics making some shots down the stretch and Lebron James missing some shots down the stretch. The last 3 real possessions for the Celtics ended up with KG scoring a 20 -footer to tie, Sam Cassell free throws from a post-up ISO to go ahead, and KG spinning into the lane on a post-up ISO to go ahead again for good. Here were the 2 last Garnett plays, 最終，比賽來到Celtics的KG連續投進了幾球，而LeBron James連續投不進幾球。Celtics 的最後三次進攻機會以KG的20呎跳投扳平、Sam Cassell 背對單打罰球超前、KG背對轉 身單打再超前直到終場結束。這裡是最後兩個KG的進攻， https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXeh88wdEDk As mentioned, just a real tough game to watch. With a final score of 76-72, you would've expected that it was just a defensive battle. Not so. This game was simply the case of the lid shut closed on the hoop, especially for Lebron and Ray Allen. The defenses were decent but not exceptional. Take this clip for example, Ray Allen and Garnett run a PNR, Szczerbiak and Joe Smith go to double Allen who had not scored a single basket all game. Lebron goes briefly to rotate to cover KG, but is splitting both KG and Pierce in reality. The pass goes to KG who is wide open for the 20-footer, which he knocks down, 就像一開始提到的，真的要很多耐心才能看這場比賽。終場比數是76比72，你會期望它 是一場防守大戰。不是如此。這場比賽只是籃框上加了蓋子，尤其是LeBron和Ray Allen 。防守是合宜的但不是非常好。拿這個片段當例子，Ray Allen和KG跑一個pick-and-roll ，Szczerbiak和Joe Smith跑去包夾Allen (譯註：所以你知道Allen在幹嘛了)，他整場 比賽還沒投進半球。LeBron輪轉去防守KG，但是實際上大約在KG和Pierce中間。然後球 傳給KG，20呎的大空檔，球進。 http://tinyurl.com/6fd293 In what essentially was the game winner by KG, the Cavs decide to play 1v1 on the ISO with Joe Smith. I think if I was Mike James, I probably would have gone with a double-team on the first dribble instead. The other possibility would've been to use Ben Wallace instead of Joe Smith, but Doc Rivers did something very astute. After the Ilgauskas tip-in, he didn't call a timeout, thus Mike James was not able to get his defensive substitutions into the game, and so Joe Smith was left to guard KG 1v1, 在這個致勝一擊中，KG決定要一對一單打Joe Smith。我認為如果我是Mike Brown(譯註 ：原文應該錯了，下同)，我會在第一個運球就去包夾他。另一個可能本來應該是使用 Ben Wallace而不是Joe Smith，但是Doc Rivers作了件狡猾的事(譯註：真難得)。在 Ilgauskas補進之後，他沒有叫暫停，所以Mike Brown沒辦法把他的防守組放上來，所 以Joe Smith就得去一對一防守KG。 http://tinyurl.com/67efbr Summary: On the TNT after show, Chuck was ripping Mike James for using "a crappy offense". That may be the case, but the Celtics weren't running anything much better and he was mum on them, at least call it both ways Chuck! 在TNT賽後評論，Chuck嘲笑Mike Brown用一個爛進攻。也許是這樣吧，但是 Celtics也 沒有好到哪裡去，至少兩邊要平衡吧。 The Celtics may have won the game, but in a way, they should be feeling extremely lucky because despite a 2-for-18 and 10 TO performance by Lebron, the Celtics barely won the game. And the Celtics did not even play great defense on Lebron who was able to penetrate and get good shots off. Having said that, KG came up big when they needed him and so credit to the Celtics for holding serve in the series. Celtics 也許贏了這場比賽，但是就某方面，他們應該要覺得非常幸運，因為儘管LeBron 投18中2 10失誤的表現，他們還是好不容易才贏球。而 Celtics甚至沒有打出很好的防 守，因為LeBron可以切入有一些好的投籃機會。話雖如此，當他們需要他時，KG扛起了 大任，所以也要肯定Celtics這一點 --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 218.166.200.209 --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.161.171.146