作者AhUtopian (It's my Life)
看板Bobcats
標題Re: [情報] 山貓與Henderson續約18M/3y
時間Thu Aug 1 10:35:14 2013
What does the Gerald Henderson signing mean to the Bobcats?
http://ppt.cc/pBeN
Restricted free-agent Gerald Henderson signed a three-year, $18-million
contract Sunday that includes a player option in the third year. What does
he mean to the Bobcats, and what do the Bobcats mean to him?
Late last week, rumors floated around suggesting Gerald Henderson and the
Charlotte Bobcats were having difficulty agreeing to a deal, and as a result
were exploring the possibility of a sign-and-trade. Just days later, Yahoo!
Sports' Adrian Wojnarowski reported that Henderson and the Bobcats were
finalizing a deal.
There was some uncertainty as to what would happen to Henderson this
offseason. The Bobcats seemed interested but not committed to retaining him,
the Al Jefferson signing meant there would be less money to throw at him,
and while it's no secret he genuinely likes playing in Charlotte, most people
felt that Henderson would try to move on anyway. Who wants to play on a
frugal, losing team, anyway?
Well, Henderson does. According to reports, Henderson also had a three-year,
$21-million contract on the table from the Bobcats. However, he decided to
take roughly $1 million less per year in return for a player option. It's
far too early to speculate on whether or not Henderson will pick up his
option in a couple years, but you can't blame him for valuing the
flexibility it affords him.
Take a look at some of the deals other shooting guards have signed in recent
years:
Tyreke Evans: 4 years, $44m ($11m/year)
DeMar DeRozan: 4 years, $38m ($9.5m/year)
Monta Ellis: 3 years, $25m ($8.3m/year)
OJ Mayo: 3 years, $24m ($8m/year)
JJ Redick: 4 years, $28m ($7m/year)
Henderson's deal averages out to $6 million per year, and while I'm not
suggesting that he's as good as any of these players (even if he is), it's
nice to see a player as versatile as Henderson retained for less than his
one-dimensional peers.
But what's most interesting is Henderson didn't sign an offer sheet with
any other team. Reports suggest he only spoke with the Bobcats and was
interested in doing what was right for both himself and the team. That might
be why they discussed a possible sign-and-trade at one point.
On the other hand, it's possible that no teams reached out to Henderson.
Many teams are well over the cap, and most of the ones that aren't have
committed to tanking the 2013-2014 season for a shot at Andrew Wiggins.
We don't know what happened, but my gut says Henderson wanted to stay from
the beginning -- unless he was offered a ridiculous amount of money to play
elsewhere.
And that's where his player option comes in. As much as Henderson loves
playing in Charlotte, he's undoubtedly worth more than $6 million per year.
But he's been part of this rebuild since it started, and I suspect Henderson
wants to see the rebuild out before committing to a longer, more valuable
deal. He's loyal, but he's not stupid.
The Bobcats have accelerated their rebuild a bit by signing Jefferson, who,
despite what most national columnists will tell you, is not part of the
Bobcats' future long-term. He's a stopgap, an investment, and most of all,
a valuable asset. He's a means to an end and by no means an indication that
the Bobcats have thrown in the towel.
Jefferson is still a very important piece moving forward and a lot of the
Bobcats' success will be determined by how well he, Henderson and Walker
play together. Steve Clifford's interviews suggest the Bobcats' offensive
system will revolve around Jefferson's ability to draw double teams in the
post.
This leaves Henderson with two main scoring options: cuts and spot-up
opportunities. According to MySynergySports.com, isolations took up the
majority (19.1 percent) of Henderson's offensive possessions last season
while cuts and spot-up opportunities took up 7.1 percent and 13.9 percent,
respectively. Isolations are rarely efficient, and Henderson's 0.77 Points
Per Possession on isolation opportunities are no exception. He was, however,
fairly efficient as a cutter and spot-up shooter, posting PPPs of 1.67 and
1.07, respectively.
By playing to his strengths, Henderson's efficiency should go up markedly.
While he responded well to being a first and/or second option in previous
years, he'll likely never make a living as a go-to player. He's a glue guy,
and a damn good one. That should become more apparent with Jefferson and an
improved Walker flanking him.
Henderson needs to continue to improve his 3-point shooting, though. He's
become a considerably better shooter as years have passed, but he's still
not where he needs to be. While 1.07 PPP on spot-up opportunities is great
for a guy that doesn't make 3-pointers consistently, Henderson's overall
efficiency would skyrocket if he's able to shoot around 35 percent from deep
or better. He's going to see a lot of open looks on the perimeter this
season, and knowing him, he's already hard at work improving his shot.
And that's the crazy thing. Henderson is only 25 years old. He's improved
dramatically since Larry Brown's firing in 2010 and by all indications will
continue to improve. He's still about three years from his prime, which,
conveniently for him, is when he's able to negotiate a new contract as an
unrestricted free agent.
Whether or not that new contract is with the Bobcats is not important at this
point. What's important is that Henderson is back, the young core is intact,
and the future looks brighter than ever.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.45.190.62
1F:推 HardER:簡譯:一、真的很便宜。二、Hendo很忠心不過不愚蠢 08/01 15:05
2F:推 HardER:三、未來戰術會以AL吸引包夾的能力為軸心,適合Hendo打法 08/01 15:07
3F:→ HardER:不過三分能力還需加強。四、Hendo還有3年的進步空間,也剛 08/01 15:08
4F:→ HardER:好是合約期間。 08/01 15:08
5F:→ HardER:五、今過暑假補強,山貓(黃蜂)的未來終於光明了一點 08/01 15:09
6F:推 c8c812345678:簽了AL就升了了一級 問題在隊上小朋友能有多少能力 08/01 16:39
7F:推 auron4041:怎麼還沒改名啊= =? 08/05 10:32
8F:推 crazyshit:應該是2014-2015球季才改 08/05 16:52
9F:推 bugiman:請問台灣買的到Hendo的球衣嗎... 08/06 10:50
10F:推 HardER:山貓的球衣我記得台灣只有出過GW跟Jack的。 08/08 13:05
11F:推 HardER:之後就算要出,我猜不是Kemba就是AL 08/08 13:05