作者zense (zense)
看板GMAT
標題[問題] OG11-CR18
時間Tue Jul 21 15:33:16 2009
OG11-CR18
18. Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to
wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to
take risk as long as the people do not harm others as a result of taking
the risk. As a result, they conclude that it should be each persion's
decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion
drawn above?
(B) Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher
because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of
people not wearing seat belt.
(D) The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory
seat-belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that
do have such laws.
想請問一下個位大大，這一題答案是B
可是為什麼不能選D? 我有一點搞不清楚這一題weaken是什麼...
就算看了後面的解釋也一樣@@
謝謝~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.132.146.208
1F：推 hann1011:主要推論是"不造成他人傷害-->可自行決定是否要繫安全帶" 07/21 16:07
2F：→ hann1011:所以B選weaken了因的部分(高保費-->造成他人財務損失) 07/21 16:08
3F：→ hann1011:B的關鍵字是"all" automobile owners ,大家要一起承擔 07/21 16:10
4F：→ hann1011:相較於D:沒有強制規定繫安全帶的州死亡率較高 只算是補述 07/21 16:14
5F：→ hann1011:前提,沒有辦法weaken主要的因果推論喔...參考看看吧 07/21 16:14