※ 引述《kenting15 (我不像我)》之銘言： : 19. GWD-23-Q32 : Excavations of the Roman city of Sepphoris have uncovered numerous detailed : mosaics depicting several readily identifiable animal species: a hare, a : partridge, and various Mediterranean fish. Oddly, most of the species : represented did not live in the Sepphoris region when these mosaics were : created. Since identical motifs appear in mosaics found in other Roman : cities, however, the mosaics of Sepphoris were very likely created by : traveling artisans from some other part of the Roman Empire. : Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends? : B. There is no single region to which all the species depicted in the : Sepphoris mosaics are native. : C. No motifs appear in the Sepphoris mosaics that do not also appear in the : mosaics of some other Roman city. : E. There was not a common repertory of mosaic designs with which artisans who : lived in various parts of the Roman Empire were familiar. : 刪了兩個，剩下三個不知道如何判斷 答案是E 題幹的因果關係： 因：identical motifs in other cities,traveling artisans(create the mosaics) ---> 果：most of the species did not live in the S when mosaics were created B: 與原題因果無關 C: 與原題因果無關，some other:是錯誤選項的長像 E: 取非後否定因，故正確 這題的關鍵字在那個traveling，因為有traveling的artisans，所以在S發現的mosaics才 有根本未在S生長的物種的形像 E的選項取非後告訴我們有一個common repertory of mosaic desighs是被住在不同地方的 artisans所熟悉的 所以根本不是因為有traveling artisan的關係 --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 218.19.95.56 ※ 編輯: wayshawn 來自: 218.19.95.56 (07/13 00:01)