※ 引述《minie (GoGoGo)》之銘言： : The population of peregrine falcons declined rapidly during the 1950’s and : 1960’s and reached an all-time low in the early 1970’s. The decline was : attributed by scientists to the widespread use of the pesticide DDT in rural : areas. : Which of the following, if true, gives the strongest support to the : scientists claim? 題目是說, 科學家認為 1950~1960~1970 falcon 數量到最低點 跟農地大量使用殺蟲劑有關 : (A) DDT was not generally in use in areas devoted to heavy industry. A DDT 並未在工業區大量使用 : (B) In the time since the use of DDT was banned in 1972, the population of : peregrine falcons has been steadily increasing. B 1972年以後禁用DDT falcon數量就提昇了 : (C) Peregrine falcons, like other birds of prey, abandon eggs that fallen out : of the nest, even if the eggs remain intact. C falcon有某些習性.....不重要 : (D) Starling, house sparrows, and blue jays-birds the peregrine falcon prey on : —were not adversely affected by DDT in their habitats. D falcon捕食的三種生物....blah blah : (E) Other birds of prey, such as the osprey, the bald cage, and the brown : pclican, are found in the same area as is the peregrine falcon. E 提到另外一種鳥 個人認為是要找加強原論述點的部份 題目不長, 看到rural應該是關鍵字.....再看看 假設科學家所說為真 農地的使用殺蟲劑使得隼的數目減少 那非農業用地咧？科學家怎麼沒提到？ A的選項提到了非農業用地, 並且說明DDT並未在工業用地使用 相對印證了- "地點" 的影響確實是存在的 說的很繞口 但我是直接抓關鍵字代到題目中去找解答的 support的題型我也不算拿手 請版友分享心得 ... (速退) --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 123.193.33.18