※ 引述《CGHS13 (.......)》之銘言： : The traditional treatment of step infections has been a seven-day course of : antibiotics, either penicillin or erythromycin. However, since many patients : stop taking those drugs within three days, reinfection is common in cases where : these drugs are prescirbed. A new antibiotic require only a three-day course of : treatment. Therefore, reinfection will probably be less common in cases where : the new antibiotic is prescibed than in cases where either penicillin or : erythromycin is prescribed. : which of the following, if true, most strength the argument? : A Some of people who are allergic to penicillin are likely to be allergic to : the antibiotic : B A course of treatment with the new antibiotic costs about the same as a : course of treatment with either penicilline or erythromycin : C The new anitibiotic has been shown to be effective in eradicating bacterial : infection othe than step : D Some physicians have already begun to prescibe the new antibiotic instead of : penicillin or erythrimycin for the treatment of some strep infections : E Regardless of whether they take a traditional antibiotic or the new one, : most patients feel fully recovered after taking the drug for three days : ANS: E : why? : 不管吃新藥或是傳統的藥 大多數的人都會覺得3天後就好了? : 這樣有支持到結論-新的藥可以降低再次感染的機會? 題目說到 下列哪個選項最可以支持文章的論點 而文章的論點是說: 因此 再次復發的機率在使用新藥的人會比使用舊藥的人還要得低..... (D)選項:已經有些醫生開始開新藥給病人吃....所以呢?? 開新藥不代表新藥就會使再 次復發的機率低....簡單來說(D)選項有點離題 (E)選項:不管他們是吃新藥還是舊藥 大多數病人"感覺"吃三天後得到充分的恢復 但舊藥 實際上療程是七天 所以他們還是會再次感染 而新藥標榜著吃剛好吃三天就好 因 此剛好符合病人們覺得三天就好 因為新藥剛好也是三天療程就好 因此感染機率 降低 --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 59.127.197.112