※ 引述《sunnyE (原來改不了?)》之銘言： : ※ 引述《CGHS13 (.......)》之銘言： : : The traditional treatment of step infections has been a seven-day course of : : antibiotics, either penicillin or erythromycin. However, since many patients : : stop taking those drugs within three days, reinfection is common in cases where : : these drugs are prescirbed. A new antibiotic require only a three-day course of : : treatment. Therefore, reinfection will probably be less common in cases where : : the new antibiotic is prescibed than in cases where either penicillin or : : erythromycin is prescribed. : : which of the following, if true, most strength the argument? : : A Some of people who are allergic to penicillin are likely to be allergic to : : the antibiotic : : B A course of treatment with the new antibiotic costs about the same as a : : course of treatment with either penicilline or erythromycin : : C The new anitibiotic has been shown to be effective in eradicating bacterial : : infection othe than step : : D Some physicians have already begun to prescibe the new antibiotic instead of : : penicillin or erythrimycin for the treatment of some strep infections : : E Regardless of whether they take a traditional antibiotic or the new one, : : most patients feel fully recovered after taking the drug for three days : : ANS: E : : why? : 因為原題提到traditional療法是7天course，but病人常三天內就懶的再吃所以病復發 : 但是新藥是三天course : 所以選項E可以支持題目 : 其實舊的跟新的藥都是吃三天就好，只是病人覺得七天很煩，還沒三天就不吃了 : 那現在新藥只有三天的療程，病人可能就比較願意接受。(重點是他們病會好) : SO這樣的療程可能比較common 想問一下 是不是因為其實多數人都在三天內好 所以 多數人選擇 只需要吃三天的新藥-病就好了 ->所以新藥的使用增加 ->增加了新藥的使用 就降低了reinfection 所以可以strenghten new ->infection less 的結論? 那麼 D 有些醫生開新藥給病人吃 那不是也可以增加新藥的使用->降低reinfection ? --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.112.115.105